Consumer hardware plus services against enterprise software plus cloud — two of the largest companies in the world, earning money in almost opposite ways.
AAPL and MSFT sit at the top of most index funds, so most investors own both without ever comparing them. Apple sells devices to consumers and monetises the installed base through services; Microsoft sells subscriptions and cloud consumption to enterprises. That drives everything downstream: the shape of revenue, the capital intensity, the sensitivity to a recession, and how each one participates in AI.
A hardware company whose iPhone anchors an ecosystem of devices, and an increasingly large services business that monetises the installed base.
Enterprise software sold by subscription — Azure, Microsoft 365, Windows and the developer and gaming assets around them.
The blended number hides the story. What matters is the growth of Apple’s services line and of Microsoft’s cloud line — those are the two engines actually setting the valuation.
Microsoft is building data centres; Apple is not. Capital intensity is the biggest single difference between the two cash flow statements and explains most of the free-cash-flow gap.
Hardware carries a physical bill of materials, software does not. Watching the trend rather than the level tells you whether mix is shifting toward services on either side.
Both generate high returns, but through different mechanics — one through buybacks shrinking the capital base, the other through operating leverage. ROIC makes the comparison honest.
Apple’s revenue follows the consumer replacement cycle; Microsoft’s follows enterprise IT budgets and cloud consumption. In a consumer slowdown these behave differently, which matters more than any valuation ratio if you already hold one of them.
Both are described as AI winners, but only one is spending tens of billions a year to be one. Compare free cash flow after capital spending, not operating cash flow, before concluding which is cheaper.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
A free account charts one company on one metric over the last five years. Putting companies against each other — up to five, on up to four metrics, over their whole history — is part of Ultimate, and every new account gets it for seven days: create an account, confirm your email, and the trial starts without a card. A chart is an address, so the link you made keeps working the day you subscribe.
Type up to five tickers onto one canvas — any listed names, not just the pairs on this site. Each company keeps its own colour on every chart.
Choose up to four metrics. Two share one chart with an axis each; more split into a panel per metric. Statement figures sit on each company’s own fiscal dates, so a quarter is never stretched to look like a day.
Open a company’s page for its Quality Score, its intrinsic value and its fair value, save it to a watchlist, or export the chart as an image. The whole chart lives in its link, so it can be bookmarked or sent.
They are different exposures rather than different qualities. Apple is a consumer franchise with extraordinary cash returns and product concentration; Microsoft is an enterprise subscription business with a capital-hungry cloud arm. Compare growth, margins and free cash flow yield side by side and decide which risk you would rather carry.
Microsoft typically reports higher gross and operating margins because software carries almost no unit cost. Apple’s margins are remarkable for a hardware company and keep rising as services grow, but the mix still includes physical products.
Both do, with modest yields relative to staples names. Apple returns far more cash through buybacks than dividends, so a yield comparison alone understates what shareholders actually receive.
Comparing companies is part of Ultimate · 7-day free trial included · No credit card to start