A technology valuation against an industrial one — the same industry priced on two completely different bases.
TSLA and GM both sell cars, and that is close to where the similarity ends. General Motors is valued as a cyclical manufacturer: low multiple, profit concentrated in trucks, capital returned through buybacks. Tesla is valued as a technology platform, with a large part of the price resting on autonomy, energy and robotics rather than on vehicles delivered. Comparing them on a P/E ratio alone will always be misleading — the useful comparison is per-unit economics and what each one earns today.
Electric vehicles built on an owned manufacturing and charging network, with energy storage and autonomy software attached.
A legacy automaker earning most of its profit from trucks and SUVs in North America, funding an electric transition alongside a captive finance arm.
The cleanest measure of manufacturing efficiency. Regulatory credits and energy revenue can flatter the headline number on either side.
Both are capital-intensive. Cash generated after the factories are paid for shows which business is self-funding its transition.
Volume and price move in opposite directions during a price war. Together they explain far more about a quarter than revenue alone.
Automotive is deeply cyclical and downturns are survived from the balance sheet. Net cash against debt and pension obligations is the resilience test.
Value the vehicles being sold today at manufacturing multiples for both companies. Whatever premium remains is what you are paying for autonomy, energy and robotics — and that part should be assessed as an option, not as earnings.
Both are exposed to the credit cycle, interest rates and consumer confidence. Comparing balance sheets and free cash flow through a downturn is more informative than comparing growth in a good year.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
A free account charts one company on one metric over the last five years. Putting companies against each other — up to five, on up to four metrics, over their whole history — is part of Ultimate, and every new account gets it for seven days: create an account, confirm your email, and the trial starts without a card. A chart is an address, so the link you made keeps working the day you subscribe.
Type up to five tickers onto one canvas — any listed names, not just the pairs on this site. Each company keeps its own colour on every chart.
Choose up to four metrics. Two share one chart with an axis each; more split into a panel per metric. Statement figures sit on each company’s own fiscal dates, so a quarter is never stretched to look like a day.
Open a company’s page for its Quality Score, its intrinsic value and its fair value, save it to a watchlist, or export the chart as an image. The whole chart lives in its link, so it can be bookmarked or sent.
The market is pricing Tesla partly on vehicles and partly on autonomy, energy storage and robotics — businesses that mostly do not generate profit yet. GM is priced as a cyclical manufacturer. Comparing them on earnings multiples alone will always look absurd in one direction.
Tesla has generally held a structural cost advantage per electric vehicle, while GM’s profit is concentrated in high-margin full-size trucks. Compare automotive gross margin excluding regulatory credits to see the manufacturing picture without the accounting noise.
It trades on a low earnings multiple with substantial buybacks, which is the classic profile. The counter-argument is that the multiple reflects the cost of an electric transition funded by combustion profits. Compare free cash flow and net cash before deciding.
Comparing companies is part of Ultimate · 7-day free trial included · No credit card to start