Acadia Realty Trust (AKR) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 84 Real Estate companies.
Acadia Realty Trust (AKR) scores 4.7 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as mixed quality. The reading rests on efficiency, and profitability is what holds it back.
One pillar, growth, is unscored because the filings behind it carry too little to judge. It is shown as a dash rather than a zero, and the overall score is the weighted average of what could be scored.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
We cannot judge Acadia Realty Trust yet, because fewer than five years had both a return on capital and a cost of capital we could measure. This is not a “no”.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
On the filings behind it, Acadia Realty Trust earns 4.7 out of 10 for business quality as of October 19, 2026. That is mixed quality on our scale. A mixed reading means the strengths and weaknesses roughly cancel out, and the case for the business depends on which pillars you care about most. The figure is a weighted average of five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks from reported statements.
Among the 84 Real Estate companies with a published score, that ranks at the 37th percentile, in the lower half of the group, above the bottom quarter. For reference, the middle of the group scores 5.2 and a company needs 5.9 to reach its top quarter, which leaves Acadia Realty Trust below the median.
Profitability scores 3.7 out of 10, which reads as weak. The median across 80 Real Estate companies is 4.8, so Acadia Realty Trust is below its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 38th percentile. Low margins and returns leave little cushion, so a downturn or a cost increase reaches the bottom line quickly.
Solvency scores 4.7 out of 10, which reads as average. The median across 34 Real Estate companies is 3.7, so Acadia Realty Trust is above its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 70th percentile. Leverage in the middle of the range is rarely a problem in good years, and it is worth watching how quickly it would tighten in a weak one.
There is no growth score for Acadia Realty Trust: too little of the pillar could be measured from the filings to give an honest reading. The overall is therefore the weighted average of the other pillars. Across 74 Real Estate companies the median for this pillar is 5.2. Growth needs at least three years of comparable annual statements, so a short or interrupted history leaves it blank.
Efficiency scores 6.3 out of 10, which reads as average. The median across 80 Real Estate companies is 6.4, so Acadia Realty Trust is in line with its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 49th percentile. Middling efficiency is unremarkable on its own, though improvements here tend to show up in free cash flow first.
On predictability, Acadia Realty Trust scores 5.0, an average reading. Its peers have a median of 4.9 across 83 Real Estate companies, which places it in line with them, at the 54th percentile. Consistency near the median is typical, and it is worth checking whether the swings came from the business itself or from one-off items.
The profile is uneven. Efficiency leads at 6.3 while profitability trails at 3.7, a gap of 2.6 points, so the overall averages a clear strength against a clear soft spot. An efficiency lead means the operation turns what it has into cash better than it does anything else. A profitability shortfall is the one most worth understanding, since it bears directly on whether the business creates value.
The pillar with the most room to move the score is profitability. If it rose to the median of Real Estate companies, 4.8, Acadia Realty Trust’s overall score would go from 4.7 to about 5.0. Only four of the five pillars could be scored. Together they carry 80 of the 100 weight points (the full set is profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20), and the overall is the weighted average of those alone.
These are the Real Estate companies closest to Acadia Realty Trust in market value. Each has its own page scored on the same five pillars, so the comparison is like for like.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading Acadia Realty Trust scores 4.7 out of 10, which reads as mixed quality. Its strongest pillar is efficiency, its weakest is profitability. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
Acadia Realty Trust ranks at the 37th percentile of the 84 Real Estate companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 5.2 and the top quarter starts at 5.9, against Acadia Realty Trust’s 4.7.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 19, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for AKR are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card