AppLovin Corporation Class A Common Stock (APP) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 80 Communication Services companies.
AppLovin Corporation Class A Common Stock (APP) scores 7.9 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as high quality. The reading rests on profitability, and predictability is what holds it back.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
We cannot judge AppLovin Corporation Class A Common Stock yet, because fewer than five years had both a return on capital and a cost of capital we could measure. This is not a “no”.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
As of October 19, 2026, AppLovin Corporation Class A Common Stock scores 7.9 out of 10 on the Lemma Quality Score, a reading of high quality. Businesses in this band tend to combine good returns with a sound balance sheet, even if one pillar lags the others. Nothing in it comes from the share price or from forecasts: it is AppLovin Corporation Class A Common Stock’s own reported numbers, scored pillar by pillar.
Among the 80 Communication Services companies with a published score, that ranks at the 99th percentile, near the very top of the group. For reference, the middle of the group scores 4.6 and a company needs 6.0 to reach its top quarter, which leaves AppLovin Corporation Class A Common Stock well above the median.
Profitability scores 9.8 out of 10, which reads as strong. None of the other Communication Services companies scores higher here, against a median of 3.7 across 77 of them. Returns and margins at this level leave room to reinvest, absorb a bad year or return cash to shareholders without straining the business.
On solvency, AppLovin Corporation Class A Common Stock scores 8.3, a strong reading. Its peers have a median of 4.8 across 62 Communication Services companies, which places it well above them, at the 82nd percentile. Balance sheet strength like this rarely makes headlines, but it is what lets a company keep investing when credit gets expensive.
On growth, AppLovin Corporation Class A Common Stock scores 9.3, a strong reading. Its peers have a median of 4.7 across 64 Communication Services companies, which places it well above them, at the 98th percentile. Strong growth means revenue, earnings and cash flow have been compounding faster than at most peers over the last few years.
Efficiency scores 7.7 out of 10, which reads as strong. The median across 76 Communication Services companies is 6.1, so AppLovin Corporation Class A Common Stock is well above its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 81st percentile. A strong efficiency reading usually shows up as healthy cash conversion: reported profit arriving as real cash rather than staying on the balance sheet.
On predictability, AppLovin Corporation Class A Common Stock scores 3.8, a weak reading. Its peers have a median of 4.5 across 80 Communication Services companies, which places it below them, at the 37th percentile. Weak predictability means revenue or earnings have swung widely from year to year, so any single year’s figures are a less reliable guide.
The gap between AppLovin Corporation Class A Common Stock’s best and worst pillar is wide: profitability at 9.8 against predictability at 3.8, 6.0 points apart. An average of two readings this different deserves a closer look than the headline number. A profitability lead usually reflects something durable in the business model rather than a good year. Uneven results make any single year a weaker guide to the next one.
Of everything that could lift AppLovin Corporation Class A Common Stock’s score, predictability matters most. Bringing it up to the 4.5 median of Communication Services companies would take the overall from 7.9 to roughly 8.0. The weights add up to 100 points (profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20), and AppLovin Corporation Class A Common Stock has a reading on every pillar.
For a fair comparison, start with companies of a similar size: the Communication Services companies below are nearest to AppLovin Corporation Class A Common Stock by market value, each scored on the same pillars.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading AppLovin Corporation Class A Common Stock scores 7.9 out of 10, which reads as high quality. Its strongest pillar is profitability, its weakest is predictability. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
AppLovin Corporation Class A Common Stock ranks at the 99th percentile of the 80 Communication Services companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 4.6 and the top quarter starts at 6.0, against AppLovin Corporation Class A Common Stock’s 7.9.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 19, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for APP are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card