Barrick Mining Corporation Common Shares (B) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 77 Materials companies.
Barrick Mining Corporation Common Shares (B) scores 2.8 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as low quality. The reading rests on efficiency, and growth is what holds it back.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
We cannot judge Barrick Mining Corporation Common Shares yet, because fewer than five years had both a return on capital and a cost of capital we could measure. This is not a “no”.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
On the filings behind it, Barrick Mining Corporation Common Shares earns 2.8 out of 10 for business quality as of October 19, 2026. That is low quality on our scale. A low reading means the reported numbers show weakness on several pillars at once, which is a reason to understand the business before anything else. The figure is a weighted average of five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks from reported statements.
Set against 77 Materials companies, Barrick Mining Corporation Common Shares lands at the 29th percentile, in the lower half of the group, above the bottom quarter. The median across the group is 4.4, and the top quarter begins at 6.2, so Barrick Mining Corporation Common Shares is well below the typical company here.
On profitability, Barrick Mining Corporation Common Shares scores 1.1, a weak reading. Its peers have a median of 4.4 across 74 Materials companies, which places it well below them, at the 23rd percentile. A low reading here is the first thing to explain: it is the pillar most closely tied to whether the business creates value at all.
Solvency scores 3.2 out of 10, which reads as weak. The median across 66 Materials companies is 6.7, so Barrick Mining Corporation Common Shares is well below its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 14th percentile. Stretched leverage narrows the options open to management, since cash that services debt is cash that cannot be reinvested.
Growth scores 0.8 out of 10, which reads as weak. The median across 57 Materials companies is 3.2, so Barrick Mining Corporation Common Shares is well below its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 12th percentile. Weak growth means revenue and earnings have been flat or shrinking against peers, which can be cyclical or a sign of a market that is maturing.
Barrick Mining Corporation Common Shares’s efficiency score is 5.4 out of 10 (average). Against a median of 5.2 among 71 Materials companies, that is in line with the group and the 56th percentile. Efficiency near the median says the operation is neither unusually lean nor unusually capital hungry.
Barrick Mining Corporation Common Shares’s predictability score is 4.6 out of 10 (average). Against a median of 4.5 among 76 Materials companies, that is in line with the group and the 56th percentile. Consistency near the median is typical, and it is worth checking whether the swings came from the business itself or from one-off items.
This is a lopsided profile. Efficiency scores 5.4 but growth only 0.8, a gap of 4.6 points, so the overall hides a business that is excellent in one respect and weak in another. An efficiency lead means the operation turns what it has into cash better than it does anything else. A growth shortfall often comes with size or a maturing market, and is less of a concern if the other pillars are strong.
Closing the gap on profitability would do the most for the overall. At the median of Materials companies, 4.4, Barrick Mining Corporation Common Shares would score about 3.6 instead of 2.8. All five pillars could be scored, so the overall uses the full set of weights out of 100: profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20.
These are the Materials companies closest to Barrick Mining Corporation Common Shares in market value. Each has its own page scored on the same five pillars, so the comparison is like for like.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading Barrick Mining Corporation Common Shares scores 2.8 out of 10, which reads as low quality. Its strongest pillar is efficiency, its weakest is growth. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
Barrick Mining Corporation Common Shares ranks at the 29th percentile of the 77 Materials companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 4.4 and the top quarter starts at 6.2, against Barrick Mining Corporation Common Shares’s 2.8.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 19, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for B are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card