Baker Hughes Company (BKR) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 87 Energy companies.
Baker Hughes Company (BKR) scores 6.0 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as solid quality. The reading rests on efficiency, and predictability is what holds it back.
One pillar, solvency, is unscored because the filings behind it carry too little to judge. It is shown as a dash rather than a zero, and the overall score is the weighted average of what could be scored.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
We cannot judge Baker Hughes Company yet, because fewer than five years had both a return on capital and a cost of capital we could measure. This is not a “no”.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
As of October 19, 2026, Baker Hughes Company scores 6.0 out of 10 on the Lemma Quality Score, a reading of solid quality. This band covers companies that do several things well but not everything, so the pillar detail below matters more than the headline. Nothing in it comes from the share price or from forecasts: it is Baker Hughes Company’s own reported numbers, scored pillar by pillar.
Ranked with the 87 Energy companies Lemma publishes, the score sits at the 76th percentile, among the stronger quarter of the group. The median across the group is 5.0, and the top quarter begins at 5.9, so Baker Hughes Company is above the typical company here.
Profitability scores 5.6 out of 10, which reads as average. The median across 84 Energy companies is 5.5, so Baker Hughes Company is in line with its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 54th percentile. Profitability in the middle of the range is neither a moat nor a warning: margins and returns look like those of an ordinary business in this line of work.
Solvency has no score for Baker Hughes Company. Fewer than half of the pillar’s metric weight could be computed from the reported statements, so it is drawn as a dash and left out of the overall rather than counted as a zero. For context, the median solvency score across 79 Energy companies is 6.5. Without it the overall says nothing about how comfortably the company carries its debt.
On growth, Baker Hughes Company scores 6.2, an average reading. Its peers have a median of 5.2 across 66 Energy companies, which places it above them, at the 62nd percentile. A middling growth reading is typical of a mature company whose next step depends on reinvestment rather than on its market growing for it.
Efficiency scores 6.9 out of 10, which reads as average. The median across 81 Energy companies is 5.5, so Baker Hughes Company is above its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 70th percentile. An average efficiency reading suggests the business turns its assets and earnings into cash at roughly the rate its sector does.
Baker Hughes Company’s predictability score is 5.4 out of 10 (average). Against a median of 3.1 among 86 Energy companies, that is well above the group and the 91st percentile. Consistency near the median is typical, and it is worth checking whether the swings came from the business itself or from one-off items.
Efficiency at 6.9 is Baker Hughes Company’s best pillar and predictability at 5.4 its weakest. The 1.5 point gap between them is worth keeping in mind when reading the overall. Leading with efficiency points to disciplined use of capital, a strength that compounds quietly. Uneven results make any single year a weaker guide to the next one.
Baker Hughes Company has no pillar below the median of Energy companies, which leaves little room to rise. Its exposure is to slippage instead, and profitability carries the most weight: one point less there would mean an overall of roughly 5.7 rather than 6.0. With one pillar unscored, the overall rests on 80 of the 100 weight points, spread across the four pillars that could be measured (the full set is profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20).
For a fair comparison, start with companies of a similar size: the Energy companies below are nearest to Baker Hughes Company by market value, each scored on the same pillars.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading Baker Hughes Company scores 6.0 out of 10, which reads as solid quality. Its strongest pillar is efficiency, its weakest is predictability. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
Baker Hughes Company ranks at the 76th percentile of the 87 Energy companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 5.0 and the top quarter starts at 5.9, against Baker Hughes Company’s 6.0.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 19, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for BKR are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card