Carrier Global Corp. (CARR) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 270 Industrials companies.
Carrier Global Corp. (CARR) scores 4.7 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as mixed quality. The reading rests on efficiency, and growth is what holds it back.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
We cannot judge Carrier Global Corp. yet, because fewer than five years had both a return on capital and a cost of capital we could measure. This is not a “no”.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
On the filings behind it, Carrier Global Corp. earns 4.7 out of 10 for business quality as of October 18, 2026. That is mixed quality on our scale. A mixed reading means the strengths and weaknesses roughly cancel out, and the case for the business depends on which pillars you care about most. The figure is a weighted average of five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks from reported statements.
Set against 270 Industrials companies, Carrier Global Corp. lands at the 34th percentile, just below the middle of the group. The median across the group is 5.6, and the top quarter begins at 6.5, so Carrier Global Corp. is below the typical company here.
Profitability scores 4.0 out of 10, which reads as average. The median across 262 Industrials companies is 4.9, so Carrier Global Corp. is below its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 39th percentile. Middling returns are common and not a flaw in themselves, though they leave less slack when costs rise or demand softens.
Carrier Global Corp.’s solvency score is 5.5 out of 10 (average). Against a median of 7.1 among 241 Industrials companies, that is well below the group and the 30th percentile. Middling solvency says the balance sheet is neither a strength nor a constraint today.
On growth, Carrier Global Corp. scores 2.8, a weak reading. Its peers have a median of 5.4 across 216 Industrials companies, which places it well below them, at the 16th percentile. When growth is this low the question is whether it is a pause or a trend, and the history behind the filings is the place to look.
Carrier Global Corp.’s efficiency score is 6.0 out of 10 (average). Against a median of 6.2 among 264 Industrials companies, that is in line with the group and the 42nd percentile. Efficiency near the median says the operation is neither unusually lean nor unusually capital hungry.
Predictability scores 5.7 out of 10, which reads as average. The median across 267 Industrials companies is 5.0, so Carrier Global Corp. is above its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 65th percentile. An average predictability reading means results have wobbled about as much as is normal for the sector.
The profile is uneven. Efficiency leads at 6.0 while growth trails at 2.8, a gap of 3.2 points, so the overall averages a clear strength against a clear soft spot. An efficiency lead means the operation turns what it has into cash better than it does anything else. A growth shortfall often comes with size or a maturing market, and is less of a concern if the other pillars are strong.
Closing the gap on growth would do the most for the overall. At the median of Industrials companies, 5.4, Carrier Global Corp. would score about 5.2 instead of 4.7. All five pillars could be scored, so the overall uses the full set of weights out of 100: profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20.
These are the Industrials companies closest to Carrier Global Corp. in market value. Each has its own page scored on the same five pillars, so the comparison is like for like.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading Carrier Global Corp. scores 4.7 out of 10, which reads as mixed quality. Its strongest pillar is efficiency, its weakest is growth. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
Carrier Global Corp. ranks at the 34th percentile of the 270 Industrials companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 5.6 and the top quarter starts at 6.5, against Carrier Global Corp.’s 4.7.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 18, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for CARR are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card