Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 260 Technology companies.
Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) scores 6.4 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as solid quality. The reading rests on solvency, and growth is what holds it back.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
Cisco Systems, Inc.’s returns on capital beat their cost in most measured years: 5 of 5 indicators passed.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
On the filings behind it, Cisco Systems, Inc. earns 6.4 out of 10 for business quality as of October 16, 2026. That is solid quality on our scale. A solid reading is a respectable business with clear strengths and at least one area that falls short of the best in its field. The figure is a weighted average of five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks from reported statements.
Among the 260 Technology companies with a published score, that ranks at the 64th percentile, in the upper half of the group, short of the top quarter. A typical company in the group scores 5.9, and the best quarter starts from 6.7. Cisco Systems, Inc. is above that typical reading.
Cisco Systems, Inc.’s profitability score is 6.8 out of 10 (average). Against a median of 4.6 among 252 Technology companies, that is well above the group and the 77th percentile. Middling returns are common and not a flaw in themselves, though they leave less slack when costs rise or demand softens.
On solvency, Cisco Systems, Inc. scores 7.9, a strong reading. Its peers have a median of 8.0 across 194 Technology companies, which places it in line with them, at the 47th percentile. Strong solvency points to a balance sheet that can carry its debts comfortably, with interest well covered and little pressure from creditors.
Growth scores 4.1 out of 10, which reads as average. The median across 207 Technology companies is 6.4, so Cisco Systems, Inc. is well below its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 27th percentile. Growth near the median is neither a reason to buy nor a concern, but it does mean the quality case rests more on the other pillars.
Efficiency scores 6.5 out of 10, which reads as average. The median across 240 Technology companies is 7.1, so Cisco Systems, Inc. is below its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 39th percentile. Middling efficiency is unremarkable on its own, though improvements here tend to show up in free cash flow first.
Cisco Systems, Inc.’s predictability score is 6.7 out of 10 (average). Against a median of 4.7 among 258 Technology companies, that is well above the group and the 89th percentile. Middling predictability suggests some volatility in the record, enough to read the other pillars with a little caution.
This is a lopsided profile. Solvency scores 7.9 but growth only 4.1, a gap of 3.8 points, so the overall hides a business that is excellent in one respect and weak in another. A solvency lead means the balance sheet is the company’s strongest asset, a cushion that buys time when trading gets harder. A growth shortfall often comes with size or a maturing market, and is less of a concern if the other pillars are strong.
Closing the gap on growth would do the most for the overall. At the median of Technology companies, 6.4, Cisco Systems, Inc. would score about 6.9 instead of 6.4. All five pillars could be scored, so the overall uses the full set of weights out of 100: profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20.
These are the Technology companies closest to Cisco Systems, Inc. in market value. Each has its own page scored on the same five pillars, so the comparison is like for like.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading Cisco Systems, Inc. scores 6.4 out of 10, which reads as solid quality. Its strongest pillar is solvency, its weakest is growth. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
Cisco Systems, Inc. ranks at the 64th percentile of the 260 Technology companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 5.9 and the top quarter starts at 6.7, against Cisco Systems, Inc.’s 6.4.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 16, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for CSCO are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card