DuPont de Nemours, Inc. (DD) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 77 Materials companies.
DuPont de Nemours, Inc. (DD) scores 2.7 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as low quality. The reading rests on solvency, and growth is what holds it back.
One pillar, efficiency, is unscored because the filings behind it carry too little to judge. It is shown as a dash rather than a zero, and the overall score is the weighted average of what could be scored.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
We cannot judge DuPont de Nemours, Inc. yet, because fewer than five years had both a return on capital and a cost of capital we could measure. This is not a “no”.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
On the filings behind it, DuPont de Nemours, Inc. earns 2.7 out of 10 for business quality as of October 19, 2026. That is low quality on our scale. A low reading means the reported numbers show weakness on several pillars at once, which is a reason to understand the business before anything else. The figure is a weighted average of five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks from reported statements.
Among the 77 Materials companies with a published score, that ranks at the 24th percentile, in the bottom quarter of the group. For reference, the middle of the group scores 4.4 and a company needs 6.2 to reach its top quarter, which leaves DuPont de Nemours, Inc. well below the median.
DuPont de Nemours, Inc.’s profitability score is 2.3 out of 10 (weak). Against a median of 4.4 among 74 Materials companies, that is well below the group and the 40th percentile. A low reading here is the first thing to explain: it is the pillar most closely tied to whether the business creates value at all.
Solvency scores 5.4 out of 10, which reads as average. The median across 66 Materials companies is 6.7, so DuPont de Nemours, Inc. is below its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 38th percentile. Leverage in the middle of the range is rarely a problem in good years, and it is worth watching how quickly it would tighten in a weak one.
DuPont de Nemours, Inc.’s growth score is 0.0 out of 10 (weak). Against a median of 3.2 among 57 Materials companies, that is well below the group and the 1st percentile. Weak growth means revenue and earnings have been flat or shrinking against peers, which can be cyclical or a sign of a market that is maturing.
There is no efficiency score for DuPont de Nemours, Inc.: too little of the pillar could be measured from the filings to give an honest reading. The overall is therefore the weighted average of the other pillars. Across 71 Materials companies the median for this pillar is 5.2. Without it the overall cannot say how well reported profit turns into cash.
DuPont de Nemours, Inc.’s predictability score is 3.2 out of 10 (weak). Against a median of 4.5 among 76 Materials companies, that is below the group and the 31st percentile. Weak predictability means revenue or earnings have swung widely from year to year, so any single year’s figures are a less reliable guide.
This is a lopsided profile. Solvency scores 5.4 but growth only 0.0, a gap of 5.4 points, so the overall hides a business that is excellent in one respect and weak in another. A solvency lead means the balance sheet is the company’s strongest asset, a cushion that buys time when trading gets harder. A growth shortfall often comes with size or a maturing market, and is less of a concern if the other pillars are strong.
The pillar with the most room to move the score is growth. If it rose to the median of Materials companies, 3.2, DuPont de Nemours, Inc.’s overall score would go from 2.7 to about 3.5. Only four of the five pillars could be scored. Together they carry 85 of the 100 weight points (the full set is profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20), and the overall is the weighted average of those alone.
These are the Materials companies closest to DuPont de Nemours, Inc. in market value. Each has its own page scored on the same five pillars, so the comparison is like for like.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading DuPont de Nemours, Inc. scores 2.7 out of 10, which reads as low quality. Its strongest pillar is solvency, its weakest is growth. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
DuPont de Nemours, Inc. ranks at the 24th percentile of the 77 Materials companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 4.4 and the top quarter starts at 6.2, against DuPont de Nemours, Inc.’s 2.7.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 19, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for DD are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card