The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. Class A Common Stock (EL) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 71 Consumer Staples companies.
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. Class A Common Stock (EL) scores 3.8 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as low quality. The reading rests on efficiency, and growth is what holds it back.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
We cannot judge The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. Class A Common Stock yet, because fewer than five years had both a return on capital and a cost of capital we could measure. This is not a “no”.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
As of October 17, 2026, The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. Class A Common Stock scores 3.8 out of 10 on the Lemma Quality Score, a reading of low quality. Scores this low usually reflect thin margins, a stretched balance sheet or an erratic record, and the pillars below show which. Nothing in it comes from the share price or from forecasts: it is The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. Class A Common Stock’s own reported numbers, scored pillar by pillar.
Among the 71 Consumer Staples companies with a published score, that ranks at the 12th percentile, in the bottom quarter of the group. A typical company in the group scores 5.8, and the best quarter starts from 6.8. The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. Class A Common Stock is well below that typical reading.
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. Class A Common Stock’s profitability score is 3.0 out of 10 (weak). Against a median of 4.7 among 71 Consumer Staples companies, that is well below the group and the 27th percentile. Low margins and returns leave little cushion, so a downturn or a cost increase reaches the bottom line quickly.
On solvency, The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. Class A Common Stock scores 4.3, an average reading. Its peers have a median of 6.9 across 65 Consumer Staples companies, which places it well below them, at the 17th percentile. Leverage in the middle of the range is rarely a problem in good years, and it is worth watching how quickly it would tighten in a weak one.
Growth scores 0.5 out of 10, which reads as weak. Every other company in the group scores higher here, against a median of 4.0 across 67 Consumer Staples companies. Weak growth means revenue and earnings have been flat or shrinking against peers, which can be cyclical or a sign of a market that is maturing.
On efficiency, The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. Class A Common Stock scores 6.7, an average reading. Its peers have a median of 6.7 across 68 Consumer Staples companies, which places it in line with them, at the 49th percentile. An average efficiency reading suggests the business turns its assets and earnings into cash at roughly the rate its sector does.
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. Class A Common Stock’s predictability score is 5.2 out of 10 (average). Against a median of 6.1 among 71 Consumer Staples companies, that is below the group and the 36th percentile. An average predictability reading means results have wobbled about as much as is normal for the sector.
The gap between The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. Class A Common Stock’s best and worst pillar is wide: efficiency at 6.7 against growth at 0.5, 6.2 points apart. An average of two readings this different deserves a closer look than the headline number. Leading with efficiency points to disciplined use of capital, a strength that compounds quietly. Slow growth limits how fast the business can compound, even when everything else is in order.
Closing the gap on growth would do the most for the overall. At the median of Consumer Staples companies, 4.0, The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. Class A Common Stock would score about 4.5 instead of 3.8. The weights add up to 100 points (profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20), and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. Class A Common Stock has a reading on every pillar.
For a fair comparison, start with companies of a similar size: the Consumer Staples companies below are nearest to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. Class A Common Stock by market value, each scored on the same pillars.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. Class A Common Stock scores 3.8 out of 10, which reads as low quality. Its strongest pillar is efficiency, its weakest is growth. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. Class A Common Stock ranks at the 12th percentile of the 71 Consumer Staples companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 5.8 and the top quarter starts at 6.8, against The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. Class A Common Stock’s 3.8.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 17, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for EL are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card