Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 84 Real Estate companies.
Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) scores 3.8 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as low quality. The reading rests on predictability, and growth is what holds it back.
2 pillars, profitability and solvency, are unscored because the filings behind them carry too little to judge. Each is shown as a dash rather than a zero, and the overall score is the weighted average of what could be scored.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
We cannot judge Federal Realty Investment Trust yet, because fewer than five years had both a return on capital and a cost of capital we could measure. This is not a “no”.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) has a Lemma Quality Score of 3.8 out of 10 as of October 19, 2026, which reads as low quality. A low reading means the reported numbers show weakness on several pillars at once, which is a reason to understand the business before anything else. Five pillars feed it, and every one of them is computed from what the company reported rather than from its share price.
Set against 84 Real Estate companies, Federal Realty Investment Trust lands at the 22nd percentile, near the foot of the group. A typical company in the group scores 5.2, and the best quarter starts from 5.9. Federal Realty Investment Trust is below that typical reading.
Profitability has no score for Federal Realty Investment Trust. Fewer than half of the pillar’s metric weight could be computed from the reported statements, so it is drawn as a dash and left out of the overall rather than counted as a zero. For context, the median profitability score across 80 Real Estate companies is 4.8. Without it the overall leans on balance sheet, growth and consistency, and says little about margins or returns on capital.
There is no solvency score for Federal Realty Investment Trust: too little of the pillar could be measured from the filings to give an honest reading. The overall is therefore the weighted average of the other pillars. Across 34 Real Estate companies the median for this pillar is 3.7. Without it the overall says nothing about how comfortably the company carries its debt.
On growth, Federal Realty Investment Trust scores 3.4, a weak reading. Its peers have a median of 5.2 across 74 Real Estate companies, which places it well below them, at the 22nd percentile. A low growth score is common for large, established companies and is not a verdict on quality on its own, but it limits how the business can compound.
Efficiency scores 3.6 out of 10, which reads as weak. The median across 80 Real Estate companies is 6.4, so Federal Realty Investment Trust is well below its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 20th percentile. A low efficiency score is worth reading alongside profitability: earnings that do not convert into cash are worth less than they look.
On predictability, Federal Realty Investment Trust scores 4.4, an average reading. Its peers have a median of 4.9 across 83 Real Estate companies, which places it below them, at the 45th percentile. Consistency near the median is typical, and it is worth checking whether the swings came from the business itself or from one-off items.
Federal Realty Investment Trust’s pillars sit close together: predictability is the strongest at 4.4 and growth the weakest at 3.4, a spread of only 1.0 points. A profile this even means the overall is a fair summary of the business. A predictability lead means consistency is the business’s strongest trait, which makes its other readings easier to trust. A growth shortfall often comes with size or a maturing market, and is less of a concern if the other pillars are strong.
The pillar with the most room to move the score is efficiency. If it rose to the median of Real Estate companies, 6.4, Federal Realty Investment Trust’s overall score would go from 3.8 to about 4.6. Only three of the five pillars could be scored. Together they carry 55 of the 100 weight points (the full set is profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20), and the overall is the weighted average of those alone.
These are the Real Estate companies closest to Federal Realty Investment Trust in market value. Each has its own page scored on the same five pillars, so the comparison is like for like.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading Federal Realty Investment Trust scores 3.8 out of 10, which reads as low quality. Its strongest pillar is predictability, its weakest is growth. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
Federal Realty Investment Trust ranks at the 22nd percentile of the 84 Real Estate companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 5.2 and the top quarter starts at 5.9, against Federal Realty Investment Trust’s 3.8.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 19, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for FRT are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card