Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 270 Industrials companies.
Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) scores 6.2 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as solid quality. The reading rests on solvency, and profitability is what holds it back.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
We cannot judge Ingersoll Rand Inc. yet, because fewer than five years had both a return on capital and a cost of capital we could measure. This is not a “no”.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
The Quality Score for IR stands at 6.2 out of 10 as of October 18, 2026, which puts Ingersoll Rand Inc. in the solid quality band. This band covers companies that do several things well but not everything, so the pillar detail below matters more than the headline. It rolls Ingersoll Rand Inc.’s profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability into one number, each judged against the norms of its sector.
Set against 270 Industrials companies, Ingersoll Rand Inc. lands at the 63rd percentile, in the upper half of the group, short of the top quarter. For reference, the middle of the group scores 5.6 and a company needs 6.5 to reach its top quarter, which leaves Ingersoll Rand Inc. above the median.
Profitability scores 5.2 out of 10, which reads as average. The median across 262 Industrials companies is 4.9, so Ingersoll Rand Inc. is in line with its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 55th percentile. An average profitability reading usually means the company earns a fair return without obvious pricing power, so the other pillars decide more of the story.
Ingersoll Rand Inc.’s solvency score is 7.2 out of 10 (strong). Against a median of 7.1 among 241 Industrials companies, that is in line with the group and the 50th percentile. A high solvency score means leverage is modest relative to earnings and cash flow, which gives management room to act in a bad year.
Growth scores 5.3 out of 10, which reads as average. The median across 216 Industrials companies is 5.4, so Ingersoll Rand Inc. is in line with its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 48th percentile. Average growth reflects a business expanding at roughly the pace of its sector, without a clear acceleration or decline.
Efficiency scores 6.6 out of 10, which reads as average. The median across 264 Industrials companies is 6.2, so Ingersoll Rand Inc. is in line with its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 60th percentile. An average efficiency reading suggests the business turns its assets and earnings into cash at roughly the rate its sector does.
Ingersoll Rand Inc.’s predictability score is 6.8 out of 10 (average). Against a median of 5.0 among 267 Industrials companies, that is well above the group and the 83rd percentile. Middling predictability suggests some volatility in the record, enough to read the other pillars with a little caution.
Solvency at 7.2 is Ingersoll Rand Inc.’s best pillar and profitability at 5.2 its weakest. The 2.0 point gap between them is worth keeping in mind when reading the overall. Leading with solvency is a defensive strength: it protects the business more than it grows it. Weak profitability can be cyclical, so it helps to know whether margins are at a low point or a long-run level.
Ingersoll Rand Inc. has no pillar below the median of Industrials companies, which leaves little room to rise. Its exposure is to slippage instead, and profitability carries the most weight: one point less there would mean an overall of roughly 6.0 rather than 6.2. The weights add up to 100 points (profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20), and Ingersoll Rand Inc. has a reading on every pillar.
For a fair comparison, start with companies of a similar size: the Industrials companies below are nearest to Ingersoll Rand Inc. by market value, each scored on the same pillars.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading Ingersoll Rand Inc. scores 6.2 out of 10, which reads as solid quality. Its strongest pillar is solvency, its weakest is profitability. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
Ingersoll Rand Inc. ranks at the 63rd percentile of the 270 Industrials companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 5.6 and the top quarter starts at 6.5, against Ingersoll Rand Inc.’s 6.2.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 18, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for IR are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card