Lennar Corp. Class A Common Stock (LEN) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 179 Consumer Discretionary companies.
Lennar Corp. Class A Common Stock (LEN) scores 3.7 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as low quality. The reading rests on predictability, and efficiency is what holds it back.
One pillar, solvency, is unscored because the filings behind it carry too little to judge. It is shown as a dash rather than a zero, and the overall score is the weighted average of what could be scored.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
We cannot judge Lennar Corp. Class A Common Stock yet, because fewer than five years had both a return on capital and a cost of capital we could measure. This is not a “no”.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
As of October 17, 2026, Lennar Corp. Class A Common Stock scores 3.7 out of 10 on the Lemma Quality Score, a reading of low quality. Scores this low usually reflect thin margins, a stretched balance sheet or an erratic record, and the pillars below show which. Nothing in it comes from the share price or from forecasts: it is Lennar Corp. Class A Common Stock’s own reported numbers, scored pillar by pillar.
Set against 179 Consumer Discretionary companies, Lennar Corp. Class A Common Stock lands at the 17th percentile, in the bottom quarter of the group. For reference, the middle of the group scores 5.0 and a company needs 6.1 to reach its top quarter, which leaves Lennar Corp. Class A Common Stock below the median.
On profitability, Lennar Corp. Class A Common Stock scores 2.8, a weak reading. Its peers have a median of 5.1 across 176 Consumer Discretionary companies, which places it well below them, at the 26th percentile. Weak profitability means the business converts less of its sales and capital into profit than its peers, which can come from thin pricing power, high costs or a temporary squeeze.
Solvency has no score for Lennar Corp. Class A Common Stock. Fewer than half of the pillar’s metric weight could be computed from the reported statements, so it is drawn as a dash and left out of the overall rather than counted as a zero. For context, the median solvency score across 141 Consumer Discretionary companies is 5.9. Without it the overall says nothing about how comfortably the company carries its debt.
Lennar Corp. Class A Common Stock’s growth score is 3.0 out of 10 (weak). Against a median of 4.0 among 149 Consumer Discretionary companies, that is below the group and the 36th percentile. Weak growth means revenue and earnings have been flat or shrinking against peers, which can be cyclical or a sign of a market that is maturing.
Efficiency scores 2.4 out of 10, which reads as weak. The median across 170 Consumer Discretionary companies is 6.2, so Lennar Corp. Class A Common Stock is well below its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 5th percentile. Weak efficiency means more capital is tied up to produce each unit of output, or less of reported profit is arriving as cash.
Predictability scores 6.3 out of 10, which reads as average. The median across 178 Consumer Discretionary companies is 5.0, so Lennar Corp. Class A Common Stock is above its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 76th percentile. Consistency near the median is typical, and it is worth checking whether the swings came from the business itself or from one-off items.
The gap between Lennar Corp. Class A Common Stock’s best and worst pillar is wide: predictability at 6.3 against efficiency at 2.4, 3.9 points apart. An average of two readings this different deserves a closer look than the headline number. Leading with predictability suits a steady compounder, even if the other pillars are less striking. Weak efficiency can reflect a heavy investment phase, which only pays off if the investment earns a return.
Closing the gap on profitability would do the most for the overall. At the median of Consumer Discretionary companies, 5.1, Lennar Corp. Class A Common Stock would score about 4.4 instead of 3.7. With one pillar unscored, the overall rests on 80 of the 100 weight points, spread across the four pillars that could be measured (the full set is profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20).
For a fair comparison, start with companies of a similar size: the Consumer Discretionary companies below are nearest to Lennar Corp. Class A Common Stock by market value, each scored on the same pillars.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading Lennar Corp. Class A Common Stock scores 3.7 out of 10, which reads as low quality. Its strongest pillar is predictability, its weakest is efficiency. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
Lennar Corp. Class A Common Stock ranks at the 17th percentile of the 179 Consumer Discretionary companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 5.0 and the top quarter starts at 6.1, against Lennar Corp. Class A Common Stock’s 3.7.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 17, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for LEN are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card