Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 84 Real Estate companies.
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) scores 6.3 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as solid quality. The reading rests on growth, and profitability is what holds it back.
One pillar, solvency, is unscored because the filings behind it carry too little to judge. It is shown as a dash rather than a zero, and the overall score is the weighted average of what could be scored.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
We cannot judge Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. yet, because fewer than five years had both a return on capital and a cost of capital we could measure. This is not a “no”.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
As of October 19, 2026, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. scores 6.3 out of 10 on the Lemma Quality Score, a reading of solid quality. This band covers companies that do several things well but not everything, so the pillar detail below matters more than the headline. Nothing in it comes from the share price or from forecasts: it is Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.’s own reported numbers, scored pillar by pillar.
Among the 84 Real Estate companies with a published score, that ranks at the 88th percentile, in the top quarter of its peers. A typical company in the group scores 5.2, and the best quarter starts from 5.9. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is above that typical reading.
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.’s profitability score is 5.5 out of 10 (average). Against a median of 4.8 among 80 Real Estate companies, that is above the group and the 61st percentile. Middling returns are common and not a flaw in themselves, though they leave less slack when costs rise or demand softens.
Solvency has no score for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. Fewer than half of the pillar’s metric weight could be computed from the reported statements, so it is drawn as a dash and left out of the overall rather than counted as a zero. For context, the median solvency score across 34 Real Estate companies is 3.7. Without it the overall says nothing about how comfortably the company carries its debt.
On growth, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. scores 6.9, an average reading. Its peers have a median of 5.2 across 74 Real Estate companies, which places it well above them, at the 77th percentile. Growth near the median is neither a reason to buy nor a concern, but it does mean the quality case rests more on the other pillars.
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.’s efficiency score is 6.9 out of 10 (average). Against a median of 6.4 among 80 Real Estate companies, that is above the group and the 63rd percentile. Efficiency near the median says the operation is neither unusually lean nor unusually capital hungry.
Predictability scores 6.4 out of 10, which reads as average. The median across 83 Real Estate companies is 4.9, so Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is well above its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 87th percentile. Middling predictability suggests some volatility in the record, enough to read the other pillars with a little caution.
The five readings are evenly matched. The best, growth at 6.9, is just 1.4 points above the weakest, profitability at 5.5, so no single pillar is carrying the score. Leading with growth is attractive as long as the expansion is earning a decent return. Weak profitability can be cyclical, so it helps to know whether margins are at a low point or a long-run level.
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has no pillar below the median of Real Estate companies, which leaves little room to rise. Its exposure is to slippage instead, and profitability carries the most weight: one point less there would mean an overall of roughly 6.0 rather than 6.3. With one pillar unscored, the overall rests on 80 of the 100 weight points, spread across the four pillars that could be measured (the full set is profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20).
For a fair comparison, start with companies of a similar size: the Real Estate companies below are nearest to Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. by market value, each scored on the same pillars.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. scores 6.3 out of 10, which reads as solid quality. Its strongest pillar is growth, its weakest is profitability. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. ranks at the 88th percentile of the 84 Real Estate companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 5.2 and the top quarter starts at 5.9, against Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.’s 6.3.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 19, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for PECO are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card