Perimeter Solutions, Inc. (PRM) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 77 Materials companies.
Perimeter Solutions, Inc. (PRM) scores 2.2 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as low quality. The reading rests on solvency, and efficiency is what holds it back.
One pillar, growth, is unscored because the filings behind it carry too little to judge. It is shown as a dash rather than a zero, and the overall score is the weighted average of what could be scored.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
We cannot judge Perimeter Solutions, Inc. yet, because fewer than five years had both a return on capital and a cost of capital we could measure. This is not a “no”.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
The Quality Score for PRM stands at 2.2 out of 10 as of October 19, 2026, which puts Perimeter Solutions, Inc. in the low quality band. Scores this low usually reflect thin margins, a stretched balance sheet or an erratic record, and the pillars below show which. It rolls Perimeter Solutions, Inc.’s profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability into one number, each judged against the norms of its sector.
Among the 77 Materials companies with a published score, that ranks at the 9th percentile, in the bottom quarter of the group. The median across the group is 4.4, and the top quarter begins at 6.2, so Perimeter Solutions, Inc. is well below the typical company here.
On profitability, Perimeter Solutions, Inc. scores 2.0, a weak reading. Its peers have a median of 4.4 across 74 Materials companies, which places it well below them, at the 37th percentile. Low margins and returns leave little cushion, so a downturn or a cost increase reaches the bottom line quickly.
Perimeter Solutions, Inc.’s solvency score is 4.1 out of 10 (average). Against a median of 6.7 among 66 Materials companies, that is well below the group and the 23rd percentile. An average solvency reading suggests debt is present but manageable, the normal state for a company that borrows to fund its operations.
Growth has no score for Perimeter Solutions, Inc. Fewer than half of the pillar’s metric weight could be computed from the reported statements, so it is drawn as a dash and left out of the overall rather than counted as a zero. For context, the median growth score across 57 Materials companies is 3.2. Growth needs at least three years of comparable annual statements, so a short or interrupted history leaves it blank.
Efficiency scores 1.2 out of 10, which reads as weak. The median across 71 Materials companies is 5.2, so Perimeter Solutions, Inc. is well below its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 1st percentile. Poor conversion of assets and earnings into cash can come from heavy investment phases, and it matters whether that investment is paying off.
Perimeter Solutions, Inc.’s predictability score is 1.3 out of 10 (weak). Against a median of 4.5 among 76 Materials companies, that is well below the group and the 5th percentile. A low predictability score often belongs to cyclical businesses, where good and bad years alternate with the economy or with commodity prices.
Solvency at 4.1 is Perimeter Solutions, Inc.’s best pillar and efficiency at 1.2 its weakest. The 2.9 point gap between them is worth keeping in mind when reading the overall. Leading with solvency is a defensive strength: it protects the business more than it grows it. Weak efficiency can reflect a heavy investment phase, which only pays off if the investment earns a return.
Closing the gap on predictability would do the most for the overall. At the median of Materials companies, 4.5, Perimeter Solutions, Inc. would score about 3.0 instead of 2.2. With one pillar unscored, the overall rests on 80 of the 100 weight points, spread across the four pillars that could be measured (the full set is profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20).
For a fair comparison, start with companies of a similar size: the Materials companies below are nearest to Perimeter Solutions, Inc. by market value, each scored on the same pillars.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading Perimeter Solutions, Inc. scores 2.2 out of 10, which reads as low quality. Its strongest pillar is solvency, its weakest is efficiency. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
Perimeter Solutions, Inc. ranks at the 9th percentile of the 77 Materials companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 4.4 and the top quarter starts at 6.2, against Perimeter Solutions, Inc.’s 2.2.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 19, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for PRM are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card