Roku, Inc. Class A Common Stock (ROKU) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 80 Communication Services companies.
Roku, Inc. Class A Common Stock (ROKU) scores 6.7 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as solid quality. The reading rests on solvency, and predictability is what holds it back.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
We cannot judge Roku, Inc. Class A Common Stock yet, because fewer than five years had both a return on capital and a cost of capital we could measure. This is not a “no”.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
The Quality Score for ROKU stands at 6.7 out of 10 as of October 19, 2026, which puts Roku, Inc. Class A Common Stock in the solid quality band. This band covers companies that do several things well but not everything, so the pillar detail below matters more than the headline. It rolls Roku, Inc. Class A Common Stock’s profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability into one number, each judged against the norms of its sector.
Among the 80 Communication Services companies with a published score, that ranks at the 84th percentile, in the top quarter of its peers. A typical company in the group scores 4.6, and the best quarter starts from 6.0. Roku, Inc. Class A Common Stock is well above that typical reading.
Roku, Inc. Class A Common Stock’s profitability score is 6.2 out of 10 (average). Against a median of 3.7 among 77 Communication Services companies, that is well above the group and the 75th percentile. An average profitability reading usually means the company earns a fair return without obvious pricing power, so the other pillars decide more of the story.
Solvency scores 10.0 out of 10, which reads as strong. None of the other Communication Services companies scores higher here, against a median of 4.8 across 62 of them. Balance sheet strength like this rarely makes headlines, but it is what lets a company keep investing when credit gets expensive.
Growth scores 4.9 out of 10, which reads as average. The median across 64 Communication Services companies is 4.7, so Roku, Inc. Class A Common Stock is in line with its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 51st percentile. Average growth reflects a business expanding at roughly the pace of its sector, without a clear acceleration or decline.
Roku, Inc. Class A Common Stock’s efficiency score is 8.3 out of 10 (strong). Against a median of 6.1 among 76 Communication Services companies, that is well above the group and the 89th percentile. Efficiency at this level means the company needs comparatively little capital to produce what it sells.
On predictability, Roku, Inc. Class A Common Stock scores 4.7, an average reading. Its peers have a median of 4.5 across 80 Communication Services companies, which places it in line with them, at the 54th percentile. An average predictability reading means results have wobbled about as much as is normal for the sector.
The gap between Roku, Inc. Class A Common Stock’s best and worst pillar is wide: solvency at 10.0 against predictability at 4.7, 5.3 points apart. An average of two readings this different deserves a closer look than the headline number. Leading with solvency is a defensive strength: it protects the business more than it grows it. Uneven results make any single year a weaker guide to the next one.
Roku, Inc. Class A Common Stock has no pillar below the median of Communication Services companies, which leaves little room to rise. Its exposure is to slippage instead, and profitability carries the most weight: one point less there would mean an overall of roughly 6.5 rather than 6.7. The weights add up to 100 points (profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20), and Roku, Inc. Class A Common Stock has a reading on every pillar.
For a fair comparison, start with companies of a similar size: the Communication Services companies below are nearest to Roku, Inc. Class A Common Stock by market value, each scored on the same pillars.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading Roku, Inc. Class A Common Stock scores 6.7 out of 10, which reads as solid quality. Its strongest pillar is solvency, its weakest is predictability. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
Roku, Inc. Class A Common Stock ranks at the 84th percentile of the 80 Communication Services companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 4.6 and the top quarter starts at 6.0, against Roku, Inc. Class A Common Stock’s 6.7.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 19, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for ROKU are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card