SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 77 Materials companies.
SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) scores 4.9 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as mixed quality. The reading rests on solvency, and predictability is what holds it back.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
SSR Mining Inc.’s filings do not show enough of the signs a moat leaves: 0 of 3 indicators passed.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
The Quality Score for SSRM stands at 4.9 out of 10 as of October 19, 2026, which puts SSR Mining Inc. in the mixed quality band. In this band one or two pillars are usually holding the score up while others drag it down, which the breakdown below makes visible. It rolls SSR Mining Inc.’s profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability into one number, each judged against the norms of its sector.
Among the 77 Materials companies with a published score, that ranks at the 57th percentile, above the middle of the group. A typical company in the group scores 4.4, and the best quarter starts from 6.2. SSR Mining Inc. is above that typical reading.
On profitability, SSR Mining Inc. scores 6.2, an average reading. Its peers have a median of 4.4 across 74 Materials companies, which places it well above them, at the 71st percentile. An average profitability reading usually means the company earns a fair return without obvious pricing power, so the other pillars decide more of the story.
Solvency scores 9.6 out of 10, which reads as strong. The median across 66 Materials companies is 6.7, so SSR Mining Inc. is well above its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 88th percentile. A high solvency score means leverage is modest relative to earnings and cash flow, which gives management room to act in a bad year.
On growth, SSR Mining Inc. scores 3.0, a weak reading. Its peers have a median of 3.2 across 57 Materials companies, which places it in line with them, at the 43rd percentile. When growth is this low the question is whether it is a pause or a trend, and the history behind the filings is the place to look.
On efficiency, SSR Mining Inc. scores 2.8, a weak reading. Its peers have a median of 5.2 across 71 Materials companies, which places it well below them, at the 16th percentile. Poor conversion of assets and earnings into cash can come from heavy investment phases, and it matters whether that investment is paying off.
SSR Mining Inc.’s predictability score is 2.1 out of 10 (weak). Against a median of 4.5 among 76 Materials companies, that is well below the group and the 11th percentile. Weak predictability means revenue or earnings have swung widely from year to year, so any single year’s figures are a less reliable guide.
The gap between SSR Mining Inc.’s best and worst pillar is wide: solvency at 9.6 against predictability at 2.1, 7.5 points apart. An average of two readings this different deserves a closer look than the headline number. Leading with solvency is a defensive strength: it protects the business more than it grows it. Uneven results make any single year a weaker guide to the next one.
Of everything that could lift SSR Mining Inc.’s score, predictability matters most. Bringing it up to the 4.5 median of Materials companies would take the overall from 4.9 to roughly 5.4. The weights add up to 100 points (profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20), and SSR Mining Inc. has a reading on every pillar.
For a fair comparison, start with companies of a similar size: the Materials companies below are nearest to SSR Mining Inc. by market value, each scored on the same pillars.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading SSR Mining Inc. scores 4.9 out of 10, which reads as mixed quality. Its strongest pillar is solvency, its weakest is predictability. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
SSR Mining Inc. ranks at the 57th percentile of the 77 Materials companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 4.4 and the top quarter starts at 6.2, against SSR Mining Inc.’s 4.9.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 19, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for SSRM are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card