Uber Technologies Inc. (UBER) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 260 Technology companies.
Uber Technologies Inc. (UBER) scores 6.8 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as solid quality. The reading rests on solvency, and predictability is what holds it back.
One pillar, growth, is unscored because the filings behind it carry too little to judge. It is shown as a dash rather than a zero, and the overall score is the weighted average of what could be scored.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
Uber Technologies Inc.’s filings do not show enough of the signs a moat leaves: 1 of 4 indicators passed.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
On the filings behind it, Uber Technologies Inc. earns 6.8 out of 10 for business quality as of October 16, 2026. That is solid quality on our scale. A solid reading is a respectable business with clear strengths and at least one area that falls short of the best in its field. The figure is a weighted average of five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks from reported statements.
Set against 260 Technology companies, Uber Technologies Inc. lands at the 77th percentile, among the stronger quarter of the group. The median across the group is 5.9, and the top quarter begins at 6.7, so Uber Technologies Inc. is above the typical company here.
Uber Technologies Inc.’s profitability score is 7.9 out of 10 (strong). Against a median of 4.6 among 252 Technology companies, that is well above the group and the 83rd percentile. Returns and margins at this level leave room to reinvest, absorb a bad year or return cash to shareholders without straining the business.
Solvency scores 8.5 out of 10, which reads as strong. The median across 194 Technology companies is 8.0, so Uber Technologies Inc. is above its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 59th percentile. Strong solvency points to a balance sheet that can carry its debts comfortably, with interest well covered and little pressure from creditors.
There is no growth score for Uber Technologies Inc.: too little of the pillar could be measured from the filings to give an honest reading. The overall is therefore the weighted average of the other pillars. Across 207 Technology companies the median for this pillar is 6.4. Growth needs at least three years of comparable annual statements, so a short or interrupted history leaves it blank.
Efficiency scores 8.1 out of 10, which reads as strong. The median across 240 Technology companies is 7.1, so Uber Technologies Inc. is above its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 78th percentile. High efficiency means assets and earnings are being turned into cash and output better than at most peers, a sign of a well run operation.
Uber Technologies Inc.’s predictability score is 2.6 out of 10 (weak). Against a median of 4.7 among 258 Technology companies, that is well below the group and the 16th percentile. When results are this uneven, the averages behind the other pillars hide a lot of movement, and a longer history tells more than the latest year.
This is a lopsided profile. Solvency scores 8.5 but predictability only 2.6, a gap of 5.9 points, so the overall hides a business that is excellent in one respect and weak in another. A solvency lead means the balance sheet is the company’s strongest asset, a cushion that buys time when trading gets harder. A predictability shortfall means the record is volatile, so the averages behind the other pillars move more than they appear to.
Of everything that could lift Uber Technologies Inc.’s score, predictability matters most. Bringing it up to the 4.7 median of Technology companies would take the overall from 6.8 to roughly 7.3. Only four of the five pillars could be scored. Together they carry 80 of the 100 weight points (the full set is profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20), and the overall is the weighted average of those alone.
These are the Technology companies closest to Uber Technologies Inc. in market value. Each has its own page scored on the same five pillars, so the comparison is like for like.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading Uber Technologies Inc. scores 6.8 out of 10, which reads as solid quality. Its strongest pillar is solvency, its weakest is predictability. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
Uber Technologies Inc. ranks at the 77th percentile of the 260 Technology companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 5.9 and the top quarter starts at 6.7, against Uber Technologies Inc.’s 6.8.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 16, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for UBER are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card