Vertiv Holdings Co Class A Common Stock (VRT) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 270 Industrials companies.
Vertiv Holdings Co Class A Common Stock (VRT) scores 8.0 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as high quality. The reading rests on growth, and predictability is what holds it back.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
We cannot judge Vertiv Holdings Co Class A Common Stock yet, because fewer than five years had both a return on capital and a cost of capital we could measure. This is not a “no”.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
Vertiv Holdings Co Class A Common Stock (VRT) has a Lemma Quality Score of 8.0 out of 10 as of October 18, 2026, which reads as high quality. A high reading means most of the pillars are strong, with no serious weakness pulling the average down. Five pillars feed it, and every one of them is computed from what the company reported rather than from its share price.
Ranked with the 270 Industrials companies Lemma publishes, the score sits at the 98th percentile, near the very top of the group. A typical company in the group scores 5.6, and the best quarter starts from 6.5. Vertiv Holdings Co Class A Common Stock is well above that typical reading.
On profitability, Vertiv Holdings Co Class A Common Stock scores 9.1, a strong reading. Its peers have a median of 4.9 across 262 Industrials companies, which places it well above them, at the 98th percentile. A reading this strong says the business earns well on what it sells and on the capital it uses, the kind of margin profile competitors find hard to copy.
On solvency, Vertiv Holdings Co Class A Common Stock scores 8.7, a strong reading. Its peers have a median of 7.1 across 241 Industrials companies, which places it well above them, at the 78th percentile. A high solvency score means leverage is modest relative to earnings and cash flow, which gives management room to act in a bad year.
On growth, Vertiv Holdings Co Class A Common Stock scores 9.5, a strong reading. Its peers have a median of 5.4 across 216 Industrials companies, which places it well above them, at the 96th percentile. Strong growth means revenue, earnings and cash flow have been compounding faster than at most peers over the last few years.
Efficiency scores 8.0 out of 10, which reads as strong. The median across 264 Industrials companies is 6.2, so Vertiv Holdings Co Class A Common Stock is well above its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 90th percentile. A strong efficiency reading usually shows up as healthy cash conversion: reported profit arriving as real cash rather than staying on the balance sheet.
On predictability, Vertiv Holdings Co Class A Common Stock scores 4.6, an average reading. Its peers have a median of 5.0 across 267 Industrials companies, which places it in line with them, at the 44th percentile. An average predictability reading means results have wobbled about as much as is normal for the sector.
This is a lopsided profile. Growth scores 9.5 but predictability only 4.6, a gap of 4.9 points, so the overall hides a business that is excellent in one respect and weak in another. A growth lead says the business is expanding faster than it is doing anything else well, which is worth checking against predictability. A predictability shortfall means the record is volatile, so the averages behind the other pillars move more than they appear to.
Every scored pillar is at or above the median of Industrials companies, so there is no catch-up left to lift the overall. The risk runs the other way: a one point fall in profitability, the heaviest of them, would take the score from 8.0 to about 7.8. All five pillars could be scored, so the overall uses the full set of weights out of 100: profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20.
These are the Industrials companies closest to Vertiv Holdings Co Class A Common Stock in market value. Each has its own page scored on the same five pillars, so the comparison is like for like.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading Vertiv Holdings Co Class A Common Stock scores 8.0 out of 10, which reads as high quality. Its strongest pillar is growth, its weakest is predictability. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
Vertiv Holdings Co Class A Common Stock ranks at the 98th percentile of the 270 Industrials companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 5.6 and the top quarter starts at 6.5, against Vertiv Holdings Co Class A Common Stock’s 8.0.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 18, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for VRT are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card