Allison Transmission Holdings Inc (ALSN) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 179 Consumer Discretionary companies.
Allison Transmission Holdings Inc (ALSN) scores 7.0 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as high quality. The reading rests on profitability, and efficiency is what holds it back.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
We cannot judge Allison Transmission Holdings Inc yet, because fewer than five years had both a return on capital and a cost of capital we could measure. This is not a “no”.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
On the filings behind it, Allison Transmission Holdings Inc earns 7.0 out of 10 for business quality as of October 17, 2026. That is high quality on our scale. A high reading means most of the pillars are strong, with no serious weakness pulling the average down. The figure is a weighted average of five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks from reported statements.
Among the 179 Consumer Discretionary companies with a published score, that ranks at the 88th percentile, in the top quarter of its peers. A typical company in the group scores 5.0, and the best quarter starts from 6.1. Allison Transmission Holdings Inc is well above that typical reading.
Allison Transmission Holdings Inc’s profitability score is 8.4 out of 10 (strong). Against a median of 5.1 among 176 Consumer Discretionary companies, that is well above the group and the 87th percentile. Returns and margins at this level leave room to reinvest, absorb a bad year or return cash to shareholders without straining the business.
Allison Transmission Holdings Inc’s solvency score is 6.8 out of 10 (average). Against a median of 5.9 among 141 Consumer Discretionary companies, that is above the group and the 62nd percentile. Leverage in the middle of the range is rarely a problem in good years, and it is worth watching how quickly it would tighten in a weak one.
Growth scores 7.1 out of 10, which reads as strong. The median across 149 Consumer Discretionary companies is 4.0, so Allison Transmission Holdings Inc is well above its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 89th percentile. Strong growth means revenue, earnings and cash flow have been compounding faster than at most peers over the last few years.
On efficiency, Allison Transmission Holdings Inc scores 6.0, an average reading. Its peers have a median of 6.2 across 170 Consumer Discretionary companies, which places it in line with them, at the 47th percentile. An average efficiency reading suggests the business turns its assets and earnings into cash at roughly the rate its sector does.
Predictability scores 6.2 out of 10, which reads as average. The median across 178 Consumer Discretionary companies is 5.0, so Allison Transmission Holdings Inc is above its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 73rd percentile. Middling predictability suggests some volatility in the record, enough to read the other pillars with a little caution.
The profile is uneven. Profitability leads at 8.4 while efficiency trails at 6.0, a gap of 2.4 points, so the overall averages a clear strength against a clear soft spot. Leading with profitability is the most valuable kind of strength, because margins and returns are what the other pillars ultimately feed. An efficiency shortfall means profit is not turning into cash as readily as it could.
Every scored pillar is at or above the median of Consumer Discretionary companies, so there is no catch-up left to lift the overall. The risk runs the other way: a one point fall in profitability, the heaviest of them, would take the score from 7.0 to about 6.8. All five pillars could be scored, so the overall uses the full set of weights out of 100: profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20.
These are the Consumer Discretionary companies closest to Allison Transmission Holdings Inc in market value. Each has its own page scored on the same five pillars, so the comparison is like for like.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading Allison Transmission Holdings Inc scores 7.0 out of 10, which reads as high quality. Its strongest pillar is profitability, its weakest is efficiency. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
Allison Transmission Holdings Inc ranks at the 88th percentile of the 179 Consumer Discretionary companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 5.0 and the top quarter starts at 6.1, against Allison Transmission Holdings Inc’s 7.0.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 17, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for ALSN are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card