Designs CPUs and GPUs for data centres, PCs and embedded systems, competing with Intel on processors and NVIDIA on accelerators.
Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) scores 6.0 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as solid quality. The reading rests on solvency, and predictability is what holds it back.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
Advanced Micro Devices’s filings do not show enough of the signs a moat leaves: 1 of 5 indicators passed.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
A challenger’s quality score is usually the story of a gap between growth and profitability: share gains arrive first and margins follow much later, if at all. Semiconductors are also genuinely cyclical, so predictability scored across a full cycle says more than any single strong year. The reading to look for is whether efficiency is improving alongside revenue or lagging behind it.
On the filings behind it, Advanced Micro Devices earns 6.0 out of 10 for business quality as of October 16, 2026. That is solid quality on our scale. A solid reading is a respectable business with clear strengths and at least one area that falls short of the best in its field. The figure is a weighted average of five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks from reported statements.
Ranked with the 260 Technology companies Lemma publishes, the score sits at the 52nd percentile, in the better half of its peers. The median across the group is 5.9, and the top quarter begins at 6.7, so Advanced Micro Devices is in line with the typical company here.
On profitability, Advanced Micro Devices scores 4.6, an average reading. Its peers have a median of 4.6 across 252 Technology companies, which places it in line with them, at the 51st percentile. An average profitability reading usually means the company earns a fair return without obvious pricing power, so the other pillars decide more of the story.
Advanced Micro Devices’s solvency score is 9.7 out of 10 (strong). Against a median of 8.0 among 194 Technology companies, that is well above the group and the 81st percentile. Strong solvency points to a balance sheet that can carry its debts comfortably, with interest well covered and little pressure from creditors.
On growth, Advanced Micro Devices scores 5.7, an average reading. Its peers have a median of 6.4 across 207 Technology companies, which places it below them, at the 41st percentile. A middling growth reading is typical of a mature company whose next step depends on reinvestment rather than on its market growing for it.
Efficiency scores 6.0 out of 10, which reads as average. The median across 240 Technology companies is 7.1, so Advanced Micro Devices is below its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 31st percentile. Efficiency near the median says the operation is neither unusually lean nor unusually capital hungry.
On predictability, Advanced Micro Devices scores 4.1, an average reading. Its peers have a median of 4.7 across 258 Technology companies, which places it below them, at the 38th percentile. Consistency near the median is typical, and it is worth checking whether the swings came from the business itself or from one-off items.
This is a lopsided profile. Solvency scores 9.7 but predictability only 4.1, a gap of 5.6 points, so the overall hides a business that is excellent in one respect and weak in another. A solvency lead means the balance sheet is the company’s strongest asset, a cushion that buys time when trading gets harder. A predictability shortfall means the record is volatile, so the averages behind the other pillars move more than they appear to.
Closing the gap on efficiency would do the most for the overall. At the median of Technology companies, 7.1, Advanced Micro Devices would score about 6.2 instead of 6.0. All five pillars could be scored, so the overall uses the full set of weights out of 100: profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20.
These are the Technology companies closest to Advanced Micro Devices in market value. Each has its own page scored on the same five pillars, so the comparison is like for like.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading Advanced Micro Devices scores 6.0 out of 10, which reads as solid quality. Its strongest pillar is solvency, its weakest is predictability. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
Advanced Micro Devices ranks at the 52nd percentile of the 260 Technology companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 5.9 and the top quarter starts at 6.7, against Advanced Micro Devices’s 6.0.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 16, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for AMD are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card