BlackRock Inc (BLK) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 261 Financials companies.
BlackRock Inc (BLK) scores 6.4 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as solid quality. The reading rests on solvency, and growth is what holds it back.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
BlackRock Inc’s returns on capital beat their cost in most measured years: 3 of 4 indicators passed.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
As of October 16, 2026, BlackRock Inc scores 6.4 out of 10 on the Lemma Quality Score, a reading of solid quality. This band covers companies that do several things well but not everything, so the pillar detail below matters more than the headline. Nothing in it comes from the share price or from forecasts: it is BlackRock Inc’s own reported numbers, scored pillar by pillar.
Set against 261 Financials companies, BlackRock Inc lands at the 67th percentile, above the middle of the group. A typical company in the group scores 5.9, and the best quarter starts from 6.8. BlackRock Inc is above that typical reading.
BlackRock Inc’s profitability score is 6.9 out of 10 (average). Against a median of 6.8 among 255 Financials companies, that is in line with the group and the 52nd percentile. Middling returns are common and not a flaw in themselves, though they leave less slack when costs rise or demand softens.
On solvency, BlackRock Inc scores 8.4, a strong reading. Its peers have a median of 8.5 across 140 Financials companies, which places it in line with them, at the 49th percentile. Balance sheet strength like this rarely makes headlines, but it is what lets a company keep investing when credit gets expensive.
BlackRock Inc’s growth score is 4.6 out of 10 (average). Against a median of 4.6 among 241 Financials companies, that is in line with the group and the 50th percentile. Average growth reflects a business expanding at roughly the pace of its sector, without a clear acceleration or decline.
BlackRock Inc’s efficiency score is 5.3 out of 10 (average). Against a median of 5.8 among 211 Financials companies, that is below the group and the 37th percentile. An average efficiency reading suggests the business turns its assets and earnings into cash at roughly the rate its sector does.
Predictability scores 6.2 out of 10, which reads as average. The median across 256 Financials companies is 4.9, so BlackRock Inc is above its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 77th percentile. Middling predictability suggests some volatility in the record, enough to read the other pillars with a little caution.
The gap between BlackRock Inc’s best and worst pillar is wide: solvency at 8.4 against growth at 4.6, 3.8 points apart. An average of two readings this different deserves a closer look than the headline number. Leading with solvency is a defensive strength: it protects the business more than it grows it. Slow growth limits how fast the business can compound, even when everything else is in order.
BlackRock Inc has no pillar below the median of Financials companies, which leaves little room to rise. Its exposure is to slippage instead, and profitability carries the most weight: one point less there would mean an overall of roughly 6.2 rather than 6.4. The weights add up to 100 points (profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20), and BlackRock Inc has a reading on every pillar.
For a fair comparison, start with companies of a similar size: the Financials companies below are nearest to BlackRock Inc by market value, each scored on the same pillars.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading BlackRock Inc scores 6.4 out of 10, which reads as solid quality. Its strongest pillar is solvency, its weakest is growth. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
BlackRock Inc ranks at the 67th percentile of the 261 Financials companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 5.9 and the top quarter starts at 6.8, against BlackRock Inc’s 6.4.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 16, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for BLK are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card