Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. Class A Common Stock (IBKR) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 261 Financials companies.
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. Class A Common Stock (IBKR) scores 7.2 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as high quality. The reading rests on solvency, and profitability is what holds it back.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. Class A Common Stock’s filings do not show enough of the signs a moat leaves: 1 of 4 indicators passed.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. Class A Common Stock (IBKR) has a Lemma Quality Score of 7.2 out of 10 as of October 16, 2026, which reads as high quality. A high reading means most of the pillars are strong, with no serious weakness pulling the average down. Five pillars feed it, and every one of them is computed from what the company reported rather than from its share price.
Ranked with the 261 Financials companies Lemma publishes, the score sits at the 87th percentile, among the stronger quarter of the group. A typical company in the group scores 5.9, and the best quarter starts from 6.8. Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. Class A Common Stock is above that typical reading.
On profitability, Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. Class A Common Stock scores 5.3, an average reading. Its peers have a median of 6.8 across 255 Financials companies, which places it well below them, at the 25th percentile. An average profitability reading usually means the company earns a fair return without obvious pricing power, so the other pillars decide more of the story.
Solvency scores 9.9 out of 10, which reads as strong. The median across 140 Financials companies is 8.5, so Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. Class A Common Stock is above its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 88th percentile. Strong solvency points to a balance sheet that can carry its debts comfortably, with interest well covered and little pressure from creditors.
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. Class A Common Stock’s growth score is 8.8 out of 10 (strong). Against a median of 4.6 among 241 Financials companies, that is well above the group and the 97th percentile. Growth at this level is valuable when it is sustained, and the predictability pillar is the place to check whether it has been steady.
Efficiency scores 5.9 out of 10, which reads as average. The median across 211 Financials companies is 5.8, so Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. Class A Common Stock is in line with its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 54th percentile. Middling efficiency is unremarkable on its own, though improvements here tend to show up in free cash flow first.
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. Class A Common Stock’s predictability score is 6.3 out of 10 (average). Against a median of 4.9 among 256 Financials companies, that is above the group and the 79th percentile. An average predictability reading means results have wobbled about as much as is normal for the sector.
This is a lopsided profile. Solvency scores 9.9 but profitability only 5.3, a gap of 4.6 points, so the overall hides a business that is excellent in one respect and weak in another. A solvency lead means the balance sheet is the company’s strongest asset, a cushion that buys time when trading gets harder. A profitability shortfall is the one most worth understanding, since it bears directly on whether the business creates value.
Closing the gap on profitability would do the most for the overall. At the median of Financials companies, 6.8, Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. Class A Common Stock would score about 7.6 instead of 7.2. All five pillars could be scored, so the overall uses the full set of weights out of 100: profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20.
These are the Financials companies closest to Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. Class A Common Stock in market value. Each has its own page scored on the same five pillars, so the comparison is like for like.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. Class A Common Stock scores 7.2 out of 10, which reads as high quality. Its strongest pillar is solvency, its weakest is profitability. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. Class A Common Stock ranks at the 87th percentile of the 261 Financials companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 5.9 and the top quarter starts at 6.8, against Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. Class A Common Stock’s 7.2.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 16, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for IBKR are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card