Chemours Co-The (CC) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 77 Materials companies.
Chemours Co-The (CC) scores 2.0 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as low quality. The reading rests on predictability, and solvency is what holds it back.
One pillar, efficiency, is unscored because the filings behind it carry too little to judge. It is shown as a dash rather than a zero, and the overall score is the weighted average of what could be scored.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
We cannot judge Chemours Co-The yet, because fewer than five years had both a return on capital and a cost of capital we could measure. This is not a “no”.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
Chemours Co-The (CC) has a Lemma Quality Score of 2.0 out of 10 as of October 19, 2026, which reads as low quality. A low reading means the reported numbers show weakness on several pillars at once, which is a reason to understand the business before anything else. Five pillars feed it, and every one of them is computed from what the company reported rather than from its share price.
Set against 77 Materials companies, Chemours Co-The lands at the 7th percentile, in the bottom quarter of the group. The median across the group is 4.4, and the top quarter begins at 6.2, so Chemours Co-The is well below the typical company here.
Chemours Co-The’s profitability score is 1.4 out of 10 (weak). Against a median of 4.4 among 74 Materials companies, that is well below the group and the 34th percentile. Low margins and returns leave little cushion, so a downturn or a cost increase reaches the bottom line quickly.
Solvency scores 1.2 out of 10, which reads as weak. Every other company in the group scores higher here, against a median of 6.7 across 66 Materials companies. Weak solvency means debt is heavy relative to earnings or cash flow, which makes the business more sensitive to interest rates and to any fall in profits.
Growth scores 1.4 out of 10, which reads as weak. The median across 57 Materials companies is 3.2, so Chemours Co-The is well below its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 23rd percentile. When growth is this low the question is whether it is a pause or a trend, and the history behind the filings is the place to look.
There is no efficiency score for Chemours Co-The: too little of the pillar could be measured from the filings to give an honest reading. The overall is therefore the weighted average of the other pillars. Across 71 Materials companies the median for this pillar is 5.2. Without it the overall cannot say how well reported profit turns into cash.
On predictability, Chemours Co-The scores 4.3, an average reading. Its peers have a median of 4.5 across 76 Materials companies, which places it in line with them, at the 44th percentile. An average predictability reading means results have wobbled about as much as is normal for the sector.
The profile is uneven. Predictability leads at 4.3 while solvency trails at 1.2, a gap of 3.1 points, so the overall averages a clear strength against a clear soft spot. A predictability lead means consistency is the business’s strongest trait, which makes its other readings easier to trust. A solvency shortfall makes the business more exposed to rising rates and to a weak year.
Closing the gap on solvency would do the most for the overall. At the median of Materials companies, 6.7, Chemours Co-The would score about 3.3 instead of 2.0. Only four of the five pillars could be scored. Together they carry 85 of the 100 weight points (the full set is profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20), and the overall is the weighted average of those alone.
These are the Materials companies closest to Chemours Co-The in market value. Each has its own page scored on the same five pillars, so the comparison is like for like.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading Chemours Co-The scores 2.0 out of 10, which reads as low quality. Its strongest pillar is predictability, its weakest is solvency. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
Chemours Co-The ranks at the 7th percentile of the 77 Materials companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 4.4 and the top quarter starts at 6.2, against Chemours Co-The’s 2.0.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 19, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for CC are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card