Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation Class A Common Stock (HYMC) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 77 Materials companies.
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation Class A Common Stock (HYMC) scores 2.2 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as low quality. The reading rests on solvency, and profitability is what holds it back.
2 pillars, growth and efficiency, are unscored because the filings behind them carry too little to judge. Each is shown as a dash rather than a zero, and the overall score is the weighted average of what could be scored.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation Class A Common Stock’s filings do not show enough of the signs a moat leaves: 1 of 2 indicators passed.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
The Quality Score for HYMC stands at 2.2 out of 10 as of October 19, 2026, which puts Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation Class A Common Stock in the low quality band. Scores this low usually reflect thin margins, a stretched balance sheet or an erratic record, and the pillars below show which. It rolls Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation Class A Common Stock’s profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability into one number, each judged against the norms of its sector.
Set against 77 Materials companies, Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation Class A Common Stock lands at the 8th percentile, among the weakest quarter of its peers. For reference, the middle of the group scores 4.4 and a company needs 6.2 to reach its top quarter, which leaves Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation Class A Common Stock well below the median.
On profitability, Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation Class A Common Stock scores 0.0, a weak reading. Its peers have a median of 4.4 across 74 Materials companies, which places it well below them, at the 1st percentile. Low margins and returns leave little cushion, so a downturn or a cost increase reaches the bottom line quickly.
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation Class A Common Stock’s solvency score is 5.0 out of 10 (average). Against a median of 6.7 among 66 Materials companies, that is well below the group and the 34th percentile. An average solvency reading suggests debt is present but manageable, the normal state for a company that borrows to fund its operations.
Growth has no score for Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation Class A Common Stock. Fewer than half of the pillar’s metric weight could be computed from the reported statements, so it is drawn as a dash and left out of the overall rather than counted as a zero. For context, the median growth score across 57 Materials companies is 3.2. Growth needs at least three years of comparable annual statements, so a short or interrupted history leaves it blank.
Efficiency has no score for Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation Class A Common Stock. Fewer than half of the pillar’s metric weight could be computed from the reported statements, so it is drawn as a dash and left out of the overall rather than counted as a zero. For context, the median efficiency score across 71 Materials companies is 5.2. Without it the overall cannot say how well reported profit turns into cash.
On predictability, Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation Class A Common Stock scores 2.1, a weak reading. Its peers have a median of 4.5 across 76 Materials companies, which places it well below them, at the 9th percentile. When results are this uneven, the averages behind the other pillars hide a lot of movement, and a longer history tells more than the latest year.
The gap between Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation Class A Common Stock’s best and worst pillar is wide: solvency at 5.0 against profitability at 0.0, 5.0 points apart. An average of two readings this different deserves a closer look than the headline number. Leading with solvency is a defensive strength: it protects the business more than it grows it. Weak profitability can be cyclical, so it helps to know whether margins are at a low point or a long-run level.
Of everything that could lift Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation Class A Common Stock’s score, profitability matters most. Bringing it up to the 4.4 median of Materials companies would take the overall from 2.2 to roughly 3.9. With two pillars unscored, the overall rests on 65 of the 100 weight points, spread across the three pillars that could be measured (the full set is profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20).
For a fair comparison, start with companies of a similar size: the Materials companies below are nearest to Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation Class A Common Stock by market value, each scored on the same pillars.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation Class A Common Stock scores 2.2 out of 10, which reads as low quality. Its strongest pillar is solvency, its weakest is profitability. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation Class A Common Stock ranks at the 8th percentile of the 77 Materials companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 4.4 and the top quarter starts at 6.2, against Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation Class A Common Stock’s 2.2.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 19, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for HYMC are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card