FMC Corporation (FMC) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 77 Materials companies.
FMC Corporation (FMC) scores 1.9 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as low quality. The reading rests on predictability, and profitability is what holds it back.
One pillar, growth, is unscored because the filings behind it carry too little to judge. It is shown as a dash rather than a zero, and the overall score is the weighted average of what could be scored.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
FMC Corporation’s returns on capital beat their cost in most measured years: 3 of 5 indicators passed.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
On the filings behind it, FMC Corporation earns 1.9 out of 10 for business quality as of October 19, 2026. That is low quality on our scale. A low reading means the reported numbers show weakness on several pillars at once, which is a reason to understand the business before anything else. The figure is a weighted average of five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks from reported statements.
Ranked with the 77 Materials companies Lemma publishes, the score sits at the 4th percentile, near the foot of the group. The median across the group is 4.4, and the top quarter begins at 6.2, so FMC Corporation is well below the typical company here.
Profitability scores 1.3 out of 10, which reads as weak. The median across 74 Materials companies is 4.4, so FMC Corporation is well below its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 32nd percentile. Weak profitability means the business converts less of its sales and capital into profit than its peers, which can come from thin pricing power, high costs or a temporary squeeze.
Solvency scores 2.3 out of 10, which reads as weak. The median across 66 Materials companies is 6.7, so FMC Corporation is well below its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 8th percentile. Stretched leverage narrows the options open to management, since cash that services debt is cash that cannot be reinvested.
There is no growth score for FMC Corporation: too little of the pillar could be measured from the filings to give an honest reading. The overall is therefore the weighted average of the other pillars. Across 57 Materials companies the median for this pillar is 3.2. Growth needs at least three years of comparable annual statements, so a short or interrupted history leaves it blank.
On efficiency, FMC Corporation scores 1.8, a weak reading. Its peers have a median of 5.2 across 71 Materials companies, which places it well below them, at the 7th percentile. Poor conversion of assets and earnings into cash can come from heavy investment phases, and it matters whether that investment is paying off.
Predictability scores 2.4 out of 10, which reads as weak. The median across 76 Materials companies is 4.5, so FMC Corporation is well below its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 18th percentile. When results are this uneven, the averages behind the other pillars hide a lot of movement, and a longer history tells more than the latest year.
FMC Corporation’s pillars sit close together: predictability is the strongest at 2.4 and profitability the weakest at 1.3, a spread of only 1.1 points. A profile this even means the overall is a fair summary of the business. A predictability lead means consistency is the business’s strongest trait, which makes its other readings easier to trust. A profitability shortfall is the one most worth understanding, since it bears directly on whether the business creates value.
Closing the gap on solvency would do the most for the overall. At the median of Materials companies, 6.7, FMC Corporation would score about 3.0 instead of 1.9. Only four of the five pillars could be scored. Together they carry 80 of the 100 weight points (the full set is profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20), and the overall is the weighted average of those alone.
These are the Materials companies closest to FMC Corporation in market value. Each has its own page scored on the same five pillars, so the comparison is like for like.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading FMC Corporation scores 1.9 out of 10, which reads as low quality. Its strongest pillar is predictability, its weakest is profitability. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
FMC Corporation ranks at the 4th percentile of the 77 Materials companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 4.4 and the top quarter starts at 6.2, against FMC Corporation’s 1.9.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 19, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for FMC are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card