New Pacific Metals Corp. (NEWP) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 77 Materials companies.
New Pacific Metals Corp. (NEWP) scores 4.0 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as mixed quality. The reading rests on efficiency, and growth is what holds it back.
2 pillars, profitability and solvency, are unscored because the filings behind them carry too little to judge. Each is shown as a dash rather than a zero, and the overall score is the weighted average of what could be scored.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
We cannot judge New Pacific Metals Corp. yet, because fewer than five years had both a return on capital and a cost of capital we could measure. This is not a “no”.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
New Pacific Metals Corp. (NEWP) has a Lemma Quality Score of 4.0 out of 10 as of October 19, 2026, which reads as mixed quality. A mixed reading means the strengths and weaknesses roughly cancel out, and the case for the business depends on which pillars you care about most. Five pillars feed it, and every one of them is computed from what the company reported rather than from its share price.
Set against 77 Materials companies, New Pacific Metals Corp. lands at the 43rd percentile, just below the middle of the group. For reference, the middle of the group scores 4.4 and a company needs 6.2 to reach its top quarter, which leaves New Pacific Metals Corp. in line with the median.
Profitability has no score for New Pacific Metals Corp. Fewer than half of the pillar’s metric weight could be computed from the reported statements, so it is drawn as a dash and left out of the overall rather than counted as a zero. For context, the median profitability score across 74 Materials companies is 4.4. Without it the overall leans on balance sheet, growth and consistency, and says little about margins or returns on capital.
There is no solvency score for New Pacific Metals Corp.: too little of the pillar could be measured from the filings to give an honest reading. The overall is therefore the weighted average of the other pillars. Across 66 Materials companies the median for this pillar is 6.7. Without it the overall says nothing about how comfortably the company carries its debt.
New Pacific Metals Corp.’s growth score is 1.2 out of 10 (weak). Against a median of 3.2 among 57 Materials companies, that is well below the group and the 20th percentile. A low growth score is common for large, established companies and is not a verdict on quality on its own, but it limits how the business can compound.
Efficiency scores 6.7 out of 10, which reads as average. The median across 71 Materials companies is 5.2, so New Pacific Metals Corp. is well above its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 83rd percentile. Efficiency near the median says the operation is neither unusually lean nor unusually capital hungry.
Predictability scores 4.8 out of 10, which reads as average. The median across 76 Materials companies is 4.5, so New Pacific Metals Corp. is in line with its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 59th percentile. Middling predictability suggests some volatility in the record, enough to read the other pillars with a little caution.
This is a lopsided profile. Efficiency scores 6.7 but growth only 1.2, a gap of 5.5 points, so the overall hides a business that is excellent in one respect and weak in another. An efficiency lead means the operation turns what it has into cash better than it does anything else. A growth shortfall often comes with size or a maturing market, and is less of a concern if the other pillars are strong.
The pillar with the most room to move the score is growth. If it rose to the median of Materials companies, 3.2, New Pacific Metals Corp.’s overall score would go from 4.0 to about 4.7. Only three of the five pillars could be scored. Together they carry 55 of the 100 weight points (the full set is profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20), and the overall is the weighted average of those alone.
These are the Materials companies closest to New Pacific Metals Corp. in market value. Each has its own page scored on the same five pillars, so the comparison is like for like.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading New Pacific Metals Corp. scores 4.0 out of 10, which reads as mixed quality. Its strongest pillar is efficiency, its weakest is growth. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
New Pacific Metals Corp. ranks at the 43rd percentile of the 77 Materials companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 4.4 and the top quarter starts at 6.2, against New Pacific Metals Corp.’s 4.0.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 19, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for NEWP are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card