ITT Inc. (ITT) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 270 Industrials companies.
ITT Inc. (ITT) scores 6.7 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as solid quality. The reading rests on solvency, and profitability is what holds it back.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
We cannot judge ITT Inc. yet, because fewer than five years had both a return on capital and a cost of capital we could measure. This is not a “no”.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
As of October 18, 2026, ITT Inc. scores 6.7 out of 10 on the Lemma Quality Score, a reading of solid quality. This band covers companies that do several things well but not everything, so the pillar detail below matters more than the headline. Nothing in it comes from the share price or from forecasts: it is ITT Inc.’s own reported numbers, scored pillar by pillar.
Ranked with the 270 Industrials companies Lemma publishes, the score sits at the 80th percentile, in the top quarter of its peers. The median across the group is 5.6, and the top quarter begins at 6.5, so ITT Inc. is above the typical company here.
On profitability, ITT Inc. scores 5.4, an average reading. Its peers have a median of 4.9 across 262 Industrials companies, which places it above them, at the 58th percentile. Profitability in the middle of the range is neither a moat nor a warning: margins and returns look like those of an ordinary business in this line of work.
Solvency scores 8.7 out of 10, which reads as strong. The median across 241 Industrials companies is 7.1, so ITT Inc. is well above its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 76th percentile. Balance sheet strength like this rarely makes headlines, but it is what lets a company keep investing when credit gets expensive.
On growth, ITT Inc. scores 6.2, an average reading. Its peers have a median of 5.4 across 216 Industrials companies, which places it above them, at the 60th percentile. A middling growth reading is typical of a mature company whose next step depends on reinvestment rather than on its market growing for it.
Efficiency scores 6.3 out of 10, which reads as average. The median across 264 Industrials companies is 6.2, so ITT Inc. is in line with its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 52nd percentile. Middling efficiency is unremarkable on its own, though improvements here tend to show up in free cash flow first.
On predictability, ITT Inc. scores 7.4, a strong reading. Its peers have a median of 5.0 across 267 Industrials companies, which places it well above them, at the 88th percentile. High predictability means the company’s results have moved steadily from year to year, which makes the other pillars more trustworthy as a guide.
Solvency at 8.7 is ITT Inc.’s best pillar and profitability at 5.4 its weakest. The 3.3 point gap between them is worth keeping in mind when reading the overall. Leading with solvency is a defensive strength: it protects the business more than it grows it. Weak profitability can be cyclical, so it helps to know whether margins are at a low point or a long-run level.
ITT Inc. has no pillar below the median of Industrials companies, which leaves little room to rise. Its exposure is to slippage instead, and profitability carries the most weight: one point less there would mean an overall of roughly 6.5 rather than 6.7. The weights add up to 100 points (profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20), and ITT Inc. has a reading on every pillar.
For a fair comparison, start with companies of a similar size: the Industrials companies below are nearest to ITT Inc. by market value, each scored on the same pillars.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading ITT Inc. scores 6.7 out of 10, which reads as solid quality. Its strongest pillar is solvency, its weakest is profitability. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
ITT Inc. ranks at the 80th percentile of the 270 Industrials companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 5.6 and the top quarter starts at 6.5, against ITT Inc.’s 6.7.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 18, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for ITT are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card