Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 179 Consumer Discretionary companies.
Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) scores 5.6 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as solid quality. The reading rests on profitability, and predictability is what holds it back.
One pillar, growth, is unscored because the filings behind it carry too little to judge. It is shown as a dash rather than a zero, and the overall score is the weighted average of what could be scored.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
We cannot judge Las Vegas Sands Corp. yet, because fewer than five years had both a return on capital and a cost of capital we could measure. This is not a “no”.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
As of October 17, 2026, Las Vegas Sands Corp. scores 5.6 out of 10 on the Lemma Quality Score, a reading of solid quality. This band covers companies that do several things well but not everything, so the pillar detail below matters more than the headline. Nothing in it comes from the share price or from forecasts: it is Las Vegas Sands Corp.’s own reported numbers, scored pillar by pillar.
Set against 179 Consumer Discretionary companies, Las Vegas Sands Corp. lands at the 60th percentile, in the better half of its peers. A typical company in the group scores 5.0, and the best quarter starts from 6.1. Las Vegas Sands Corp. is above that typical reading.
Profitability scores 8.9 out of 10, which reads as strong. The median across 176 Consumer Discretionary companies is 5.1, so Las Vegas Sands Corp. is well above its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 91st percentile. A reading this strong says the business earns well on what it sells and on the capital it uses, the kind of margin profile competitors find hard to copy.
Solvency scores 4.4 out of 10, which reads as average. The median across 141 Consumer Discretionary companies is 5.9, so Las Vegas Sands Corp. is well below its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 30th percentile. Middling solvency says the balance sheet is neither a strength nor a constraint today.
Growth has no score for Las Vegas Sands Corp. Fewer than half of the pillar’s metric weight could be computed from the reported statements, so it is drawn as a dash and left out of the overall rather than counted as a zero. For context, the median growth score across 149 Consumer Discretionary companies is 4.0. Growth needs at least three years of comparable annual statements, so a short or interrupted history leaves it blank.
On efficiency, Las Vegas Sands Corp. scores 6.9, an average reading. Its peers have a median of 6.2 across 170 Consumer Discretionary companies, which places it above them, at the 73rd percentile. An average efficiency reading suggests the business turns its assets and earnings into cash at roughly the rate its sector does.
Predictability scores 1.6 out of 10, which reads as weak. The median across 178 Consumer Discretionary companies is 5.0, so Las Vegas Sands Corp. is well below its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 5th percentile. A low predictability score often belongs to cyclical businesses, where good and bad years alternate with the economy or with commodity prices.
The gap between Las Vegas Sands Corp.’s best and worst pillar is wide: profitability at 8.9 against predictability at 1.6, 7.3 points apart. An average of two readings this different deserves a closer look than the headline number. A profitability lead usually reflects something durable in the business model rather than a good year. Uneven results make any single year a weaker guide to the next one.
Of everything that could lift Las Vegas Sands Corp.’s score, predictability matters most. Bringing it up to the 5.0 median of Consumer Discretionary companies would take the overall from 5.6 to roughly 6.4. With one pillar unscored, the overall rests on 80 of the 100 weight points, spread across the four pillars that could be measured (the full set is profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20).
For a fair comparison, start with companies of a similar size: the Consumer Discretionary companies below are nearest to Las Vegas Sands Corp. by market value, each scored on the same pillars.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading Las Vegas Sands Corp. scores 5.6 out of 10, which reads as solid quality. Its strongest pillar is profitability, its weakest is predictability. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
Las Vegas Sands Corp. ranks at the 60th percentile of the 179 Consumer Discretionary companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 5.0 and the top quarter starts at 6.1, against Las Vegas Sands Corp.’s 5.6.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 17, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for LVS are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card