Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 179 Consumer Discretionary companies.
Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) scores 5.5 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as solid quality. The reading rests on profitability, and solvency is what holds it back.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
We cannot judge Restaurant Brands International Inc. yet, because fewer than five years had both a return on capital and a cost of capital we could measure. This is not a “no”.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
On the filings behind it, Restaurant Brands International Inc. earns 5.5 out of 10 for business quality as of October 17, 2026. That is solid quality on our scale. A solid reading is a respectable business with clear strengths and at least one area that falls short of the best in its field. The figure is a weighted average of five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks from reported statements.
Among the 179 Consumer Discretionary companies with a published score, that ranks at the 58th percentile, above the middle of the group. For reference, the middle of the group scores 5.0 and a company needs 6.1 to reach its top quarter, which leaves Restaurant Brands International Inc. above the median.
Restaurant Brands International Inc.’s profitability score is 7.6 out of 10 (strong). Against a median of 5.1 among 176 Consumer Discretionary companies, that is well above the group and the 78th percentile. Returns and margins at this level leave room to reinvest, absorb a bad year or return cash to shareholders without straining the business.
On solvency, Restaurant Brands International Inc. scores 3.1, a weak reading. Its peers have a median of 5.9 across 141 Consumer Discretionary companies, which places it well below them, at the 19th percentile. Stretched leverage narrows the options open to management, since cash that services debt is cash that cannot be reinvested.
Growth scores 4.0 out of 10, which reads as average. The median across 149 Consumer Discretionary companies is 4.0, so Restaurant Brands International Inc. is in line with its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 50th percentile. Average growth reflects a business expanding at roughly the pace of its sector, without a clear acceleration or decline.
Restaurant Brands International Inc.’s efficiency score is 5.2 out of 10 (average). Against a median of 6.2 among 170 Consumer Discretionary companies, that is below the group and the 34th percentile. An average efficiency reading suggests the business turns its assets and earnings into cash at roughly the rate its sector does.
On predictability, Restaurant Brands International Inc. scores 7.0, a strong reading. Its peers have a median of 5.0 across 178 Consumer Discretionary companies, which places it well above them, at the 85th percentile. High predictability means the company’s results have moved steadily from year to year, which makes the other pillars more trustworthy as a guide.
This is a lopsided profile. Profitability scores 7.6 but solvency only 3.1, a gap of 4.5 points, so the overall hides a business that is excellent in one respect and weak in another. Leading with profitability is the most valuable kind of strength, because margins and returns are what the other pillars ultimately feed. A solvency shortfall makes the business more exposed to rising rates and to a weak year.
The pillar with the most room to move the score is solvency. If it rose to the median of Consumer Discretionary companies, 5.9, Restaurant Brands International Inc.’s overall score would go from 5.5 to about 6.1. All five pillars could be scored, so the overall uses the full set of weights out of 100: profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20.
These are the Consumer Discretionary companies closest to Restaurant Brands International Inc. in market value. Each has its own page scored on the same five pillars, so the comparison is like for like.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading Restaurant Brands International Inc. scores 5.5 out of 10, which reads as solid quality. Its strongest pillar is profitability, its weakest is solvency. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
Restaurant Brands International Inc. ranks at the 58th percentile of the 179 Consumer Discretionary companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 5.0 and the top quarter starts at 6.1, against Restaurant Brands International Inc.’s 5.5.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 17, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for QSR are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card