Public Service Enterprise Group Inc. (PEG) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 52 Utilities companies.
Public Service Enterprise Group Inc. (PEG) scores 3.6 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as low quality. The reading rests on profitability, and solvency is what holds it back.
One pillar, growth, is unscored because the filings behind it carry too little to judge. It is shown as a dash rather than a zero, and the overall score is the weighted average of what could be scored.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
We cannot judge Public Service Enterprise Group Inc. yet, because fewer than five years had both a return on capital and a cost of capital we could measure. This is not a “no”.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
Public Service Enterprise Group Inc. (PEG) has a Lemma Quality Score of 3.6 out of 10 as of October 17, 2026, which reads as low quality. A low reading means the reported numbers show weakness on several pillars at once, which is a reason to understand the business before anything else. Five pillars feed it, and every one of them is computed from what the company reported rather than from its share price.
Set against 52 Utilities companies, Public Service Enterprise Group Inc. lands at the 27th percentile, just below the middle of the group. For reference, the middle of the group scores 3.9 and a company needs 4.4 to reach its top quarter, which leaves Public Service Enterprise Group Inc. in line with the median.
Profitability scores 5.7 out of 10, which reads as average. The median across 49 Utilities companies is 4.8, so Public Service Enterprise Group Inc. is above its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 77th percentile. An average profitability reading usually means the company earns a fair return without obvious pricing power, so the other pillars decide more of the story.
On solvency, Public Service Enterprise Group Inc. scores 2.3, a weak reading. Its peers have a median of 2.9 across 49 Utilities companies, which places it below them, at the 19th percentile. Weak solvency means debt is heavy relative to earnings or cash flow, which makes the business more sensitive to interest rates and to any fall in profits.
There is no growth score for Public Service Enterprise Group Inc.: too little of the pillar could be measured from the filings to give an honest reading. The overall is therefore the weighted average of the other pillars. Across 47 Utilities companies the median for this pillar is 4.9. Growth needs at least three years of comparable annual statements, so a short or interrupted history leaves it blank.
Efficiency scores 3.4 out of 10, which reads as weak. The median across 51 Utilities companies is 3.0, so Public Service Enterprise Group Inc. is in line with its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 66th percentile. Poor conversion of assets and earnings into cash can come from heavy investment phases, and it matters whether that investment is paying off.
Predictability scores 2.4 out of 10, which reads as weak. The median across 51 Utilities companies is 3.5, so Public Service Enterprise Group Inc. is below its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 28th percentile. A low predictability score often belongs to cyclical businesses, where good and bad years alternate with the economy or with commodity prices.
The profile is uneven. Profitability leads at 5.7 while solvency trails at 2.3, a gap of 3.4 points, so the overall averages a clear strength against a clear soft spot. Leading with profitability is the most valuable kind of strength, because margins and returns are what the other pillars ultimately feed. A solvency shortfall makes the business more exposed to rising rates and to a weak year.
Closing the gap on predictability would do the most for the overall. At the median of Utilities companies, 3.5, Public Service Enterprise Group Inc. would score about 3.9 instead of 3.6. Only four of the five pillars could be scored. Together they carry 80 of the 100 weight points (the full set is profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20), and the overall is the weighted average of those alone.
These are the Utilities companies closest to Public Service Enterprise Group Inc. in market value. Each has its own page scored on the same five pillars, so the comparison is like for like.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading Public Service Enterprise Group Inc. scores 3.6 out of 10, which reads as low quality. Its strongest pillar is profitability, its weakest is solvency. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
Public Service Enterprise Group Inc. ranks at the 27th percentile of the 52 Utilities companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 3.9 and the top quarter starts at 4.4, against Public Service Enterprise Group Inc.’s 3.6.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 17, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for PEG are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card