Exelon Corp. (EXC) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 52 Utilities companies.
Exelon Corp. (EXC) scores 3.2 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as low quality. The reading rests on profitability, and solvency is what holds it back.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
We cannot judge Exelon Corp. yet, because fewer than five years had both a return on capital and a cost of capital we could measure. This is not a “no”.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
On the filings behind it, Exelon Corp. earns 3.2 out of 10 for business quality as of October 17, 2026. That is low quality on our scale. A low reading means the reported numbers show weakness on several pillars at once, which is a reason to understand the business before anything else. The figure is a weighted average of five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks from reported statements.
Among the 52 Utilities companies with a published score, that ranks at the 14th percentile, among the weakest quarter of its peers. For reference, the middle of the group scores 3.9 and a company needs 4.4 to reach its top quarter, which leaves Exelon Corp. below the median.
Exelon Corp.’s profitability score is 4.2 out of 10 (average). Against a median of 4.8 among 49 Utilities companies, that is below the group and the 29th percentile. Middling returns are common and not a flaw in themselves, though they leave less slack when costs rise or demand softens.
Solvency scores 2.4 out of 10, which reads as weak. The median across 49 Utilities companies is 2.9, so Exelon Corp. is below its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 27th percentile. A low reading here is a question about resilience: how long the company could keep paying its obligations if earnings dropped.
Growth scores 3.0 out of 10, which reads as weak. The median across 47 Utilities companies is 4.9, so Exelon Corp. is well below its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 9th percentile. A low growth score is common for large, established companies and is not a verdict on quality on its own, but it limits how the business can compound.
Efficiency scores 3.3 out of 10, which reads as weak. The median across 51 Utilities companies is 3.0, so Exelon Corp. is in line with its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 62nd percentile. A low efficiency score is worth reading alongside profitability: earnings that do not convert into cash are worth less than they look.
Predictability scores 3.0 out of 10, which reads as weak. The median across 51 Utilities companies is 3.5, so Exelon Corp. is below its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 42nd percentile. When results are this uneven, the averages behind the other pillars hide a lot of movement, and a longer history tells more than the latest year.
The profile is uneven. Profitability leads at 4.2 while solvency trails at 2.4, a gap of 1.8 points, so the overall averages a clear strength against a clear soft spot. Leading with profitability is the most valuable kind of strength, because margins and returns are what the other pillars ultimately feed. A solvency shortfall makes the business more exposed to rising rates and to a weak year.
Closing the gap on growth would do the most for the overall. At the median of Utilities companies, 4.9, Exelon Corp. would score about 3.6 instead of 3.2. All five pillars could be scored, so the overall uses the full set of weights out of 100: profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20.
These are the Utilities companies closest to Exelon Corp. in market value. Each has its own page scored on the same five pillars, so the comparison is like for like.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading Exelon Corp. scores 3.2 out of 10, which reads as low quality. Its strongest pillar is profitability, its weakest is solvency. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
Exelon Corp. ranks at the 14th percentile of the 52 Utilities companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 3.9 and the top quarter starts at 4.4, against Exelon Corp.’s 3.2.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 17, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for EXC are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card