Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 270 Industrials companies.
Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) scores 7.3 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as high quality. The reading rests on profitability, and predictability is what holds it back.
One pillar, efficiency, is unscored because the filings behind it carry too little to judge. It is shown as a dash rather than a zero, and the overall score is the weighted average of what could be scored.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
We cannot judge Parker-Hannifin Corporation yet, because fewer than five years had both a return on capital and a cost of capital we could measure. This is not a “no”.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
On the filings behind it, Parker-Hannifin Corporation earns 7.3 out of 10 for business quality as of October 18, 2026. That is high quality on our scale. A high reading means most of the pillars are strong, with no serious weakness pulling the average down. The figure is a weighted average of five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks from reported statements.
Set against 270 Industrials companies, Parker-Hannifin Corporation lands at the 90th percentile, in the top tenth of its peers. The median across the group is 5.6, and the top quarter begins at 6.5, so Parker-Hannifin Corporation is well above the typical company here.
On profitability, Parker-Hannifin Corporation scores 8.0, a strong reading. Its peers have a median of 4.9 across 262 Industrials companies, which places it well above them, at the 89th percentile. High profitability means each unit of capital and of sales is turning into more profit than at most of its peers, which is usually the first sign of pricing power or a cost advantage.
Solvency scores 7.7 out of 10, which reads as strong. The median across 241 Industrials companies is 7.1, so Parker-Hannifin Corporation is above its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 56th percentile. A high solvency score means leverage is modest relative to earnings and cash flow, which gives management room to act in a bad year.
On growth, Parker-Hannifin Corporation scores 7.3, a strong reading. Its peers have a median of 5.4 across 216 Industrials companies, which places it well above them, at the 79th percentile. Strong growth means revenue, earnings and cash flow have been compounding faster than at most peers over the last few years.
There is no efficiency score for Parker-Hannifin Corporation: too little of the pillar could be measured from the filings to give an honest reading. The overall is therefore the weighted average of the other pillars. Across 264 Industrials companies the median for this pillar is 6.2. Without it the overall cannot say how well reported profit turns into cash.
On predictability, Parker-Hannifin Corporation scores 6.3, an average reading. Its peers have a median of 5.0 across 267 Industrials companies, which places it above them, at the 74th percentile. Middling predictability suggests some volatility in the record, enough to read the other pillars with a little caution.
The profile is uneven. Profitability leads at 8.0 while predictability trails at 6.3, a gap of 1.7 points, so the overall averages a clear strength against a clear soft spot. Leading with profitability is the most valuable kind of strength, because margins and returns are what the other pillars ultimately feed. A predictability shortfall means the record is volatile, so the averages behind the other pillars move more than they appear to.
Every scored pillar is at or above the median of Industrials companies, so there is no catch-up left to lift the overall. The risk runs the other way: a one point fall in profitability, the heaviest of them, would take the score from 7.3 to about 7.0. Only four of the five pillars could be scored. Together they carry 85 of the 100 weight points (the full set is profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20), and the overall is the weighted average of those alone.
These are the Industrials companies closest to Parker-Hannifin Corporation in market value. Each has its own page scored on the same five pillars, so the comparison is like for like.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading Parker-Hannifin Corporation scores 7.3 out of 10, which reads as high quality. Its strongest pillar is profitability, its weakest is predictability. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
Parker-Hannifin Corporation ranks at the 90th percentile of the 270 Industrials companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 5.6 and the top quarter starts at 6.5, against Parker-Hannifin Corporation’s 7.3.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 18, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for PH are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card