Terreno Realty Corporation (TRNO) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 84 Real Estate companies.
Terreno Realty Corporation (TRNO) scores 6.8 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as solid quality. The reading rests on growth, and efficiency is what holds it back.
One pillar, solvency, is unscored because the filings behind it carry too little to judge. It is shown as a dash rather than a zero, and the overall score is the weighted average of what could be scored.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
We cannot judge Terreno Realty Corporation yet, because fewer than five years had both a return on capital and a cost of capital we could measure. This is not a “no”.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
As of October 19, 2026, Terreno Realty Corporation scores 6.8 out of 10 on the Lemma Quality Score, a reading of solid quality. This band covers companies that do several things well but not everything, so the pillar detail below matters more than the headline. Nothing in it comes from the share price or from forecasts: it is Terreno Realty Corporation’s own reported numbers, scored pillar by pillar.
Set against 84 Real Estate companies, Terreno Realty Corporation lands at the 97th percentile, in the top tenth of its peers. The median across the group is 5.2, and the top quarter begins at 5.9, so Terreno Realty Corporation is well above the typical company here.
Profitability scores 7.9 out of 10, which reads as strong. The median across 80 Real Estate companies is 4.8, so Terreno Realty Corporation is well above its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 94th percentile. Returns and margins at this level leave room to reinvest, absorb a bad year or return cash to shareholders without straining the business.
Solvency has no score for Terreno Realty Corporation. Fewer than half of the pillar’s metric weight could be computed from the reported statements, so it is drawn as a dash and left out of the overall rather than counted as a zero. For context, the median solvency score across 34 Real Estate companies is 3.7. Without it the overall says nothing about how comfortably the company carries its debt.
On growth, Terreno Realty Corporation scores 8.9, a strong reading. Its peers have a median of 5.2 across 74 Real Estate companies, which places it well above them, at the 92nd percentile. A high growth score rewards a business that is getting bigger in a way that reaches the bottom line, not just the top one.
Efficiency scores 3.4 out of 10, which reads as weak. The median across 80 Real Estate companies is 6.4, so Terreno Realty Corporation is well below its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 18th percentile. Poor conversion of assets and earnings into cash can come from heavy investment phases, and it matters whether that investment is paying off.
Terreno Realty Corporation’s predictability score is 5.9 out of 10 (average). Against a median of 4.9 among 83 Real Estate companies, that is above the group and the 79th percentile. Middling predictability suggests some volatility in the record, enough to read the other pillars with a little caution.
The gap between Terreno Realty Corporation’s best and worst pillar is wide: growth at 8.9 against efficiency at 3.4, 5.5 points apart. An average of two readings this different deserves a closer look than the headline number. Leading with growth is attractive as long as the expansion is earning a decent return. Weak efficiency can reflect a heavy investment phase, which only pays off if the investment earns a return.
Of everything that could lift Terreno Realty Corporation’s score, efficiency matters most. Bringing it up to the 6.4 median of Real Estate companies would take the overall from 6.8 to roughly 7.4. With one pillar unscored, the overall rests on 80 of the 100 weight points, spread across the four pillars that could be measured (the full set is profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20).
For a fair comparison, start with companies of a similar size: the Real Estate companies below are nearest to Terreno Realty Corporation by market value, each scored on the same pillars.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading Terreno Realty Corporation scores 6.8 out of 10, which reads as solid quality. Its strongest pillar is growth, its weakest is efficiency. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
Terreno Realty Corporation ranks at the 97th percentile of the 84 Real Estate companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 5.2 and the top quarter starts at 5.9, against Terreno Realty Corporation’s 6.8.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 19, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for TRNO are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card