Tradeweb Markets Inc. Class A Common Stock (TW) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 261 Financials companies.
Tradeweb Markets Inc. Class A Common Stock (TW) scores 8.0 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as high quality. The reading rests on efficiency, and predictability is what holds it back.
One pillar, solvency, is unscored because the filings behind it carry too little to judge. It is shown as a dash rather than a zero, and the overall score is the weighted average of what could be scored.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
Tradeweb Markets Inc. Class A Common Stock’s filings do not show enough of the signs a moat leaves: 2 of 4 indicators passed.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
As of October 16, 2026, Tradeweb Markets Inc. Class A Common Stock scores 8.0 out of 10 on the Lemma Quality Score, a reading of high quality. Businesses in this band tend to combine good returns with a sound balance sheet, even if one pillar lags the others. Nothing in it comes from the share price or from forecasts: it is Tradeweb Markets Inc. Class A Common Stock’s own reported numbers, scored pillar by pillar.
Set against 261 Financials companies, Tradeweb Markets Inc. Class A Common Stock lands at the 96th percentile, near the very top of the group. For reference, the middle of the group scores 5.9 and a company needs 6.8 to reach its top quarter, which leaves Tradeweb Markets Inc. Class A Common Stock well above the median.
On profitability, Tradeweb Markets Inc. Class A Common Stock scores 7.6, a strong reading. Its peers have a median of 6.8 across 255 Financials companies, which places it above them, at the 70th percentile. Returns and margins at this level leave room to reinvest, absorb a bad year or return cash to shareholders without straining the business.
Solvency has no score for Tradeweb Markets Inc. Class A Common Stock. Fewer than half of the pillar’s metric weight could be computed from the reported statements, so it is drawn as a dash and left out of the overall rather than counted as a zero. For context, the median solvency score across 140 Financials companies is 8.5. Without it the overall says nothing about how comfortably the company carries its debt.
Growth scores 8.5 out of 10, which reads as strong. The median across 241 Financials companies is 4.6, so Tradeweb Markets Inc. Class A Common Stock is well above its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 95th percentile. A high growth score rewards a business that is getting bigger in a way that reaches the bottom line, not just the top one.
Tradeweb Markets Inc. Class A Common Stock’s efficiency score is 9.5 out of 10 (strong). Against a median of 5.8 among 211 Financials companies, that is well above the group and the 85th percentile. A strong efficiency reading usually shows up as healthy cash conversion: reported profit arriving as real cash rather than staying on the balance sheet.
Tradeweb Markets Inc. Class A Common Stock’s predictability score is 6.7 out of 10 (average). Against a median of 4.9 among 256 Financials companies, that is well above the group and the 84th percentile. An average predictability reading means results have wobbled about as much as is normal for the sector.
Efficiency at 9.5 is Tradeweb Markets Inc. Class A Common Stock’s best pillar and predictability at 6.7 its weakest. The 2.8 point gap between them is worth keeping in mind when reading the overall. Leading with efficiency points to disciplined use of capital, a strength that compounds quietly. Uneven results make any single year a weaker guide to the next one.
Tradeweb Markets Inc. Class A Common Stock has no pillar below the median of Financials companies, which leaves little room to rise. Its exposure is to slippage instead, and profitability carries the most weight: one point less there would mean an overall of roughly 7.7 rather than 8.0. With one pillar unscored, the overall rests on 80 of the 100 weight points, spread across the four pillars that could be measured (the full set is profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20).
For a fair comparison, start with companies of a similar size: the Financials companies below are nearest to Tradeweb Markets Inc. Class A Common Stock by market value, each scored on the same pillars.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading Tradeweb Markets Inc. Class A Common Stock scores 8.0 out of 10, which reads as high quality. Its strongest pillar is efficiency, its weakest is predictability. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
Tradeweb Markets Inc. Class A Common Stock ranks at the 96th percentile of the 261 Financials companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 5.9 and the top quarter starts at 6.8, against Tradeweb Markets Inc. Class A Common Stock’s 8.0.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 16, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for TW are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card