People Inc. (IAC) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 80 Communication Services companies.
People Inc. (IAC) scores 2.7 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as low quality. The reading rests on efficiency, and profitability is what holds it back.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
People Inc.’s filings do not show enough of the signs a moat leaves: 2 of 5 indicators passed.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
As of October 19, 2026, People Inc. scores 2.7 out of 10 on the Lemma Quality Score, a reading of low quality. Scores this low usually reflect thin margins, a stretched balance sheet or an erratic record, and the pillars below show which. Nothing in it comes from the share price or from forecasts: it is People Inc.’s own reported numbers, scored pillar by pillar.
Ranked with the 80 Communication Services companies Lemma publishes, the score sits at the 15th percentile, among the weakest quarter of its peers. For reference, the middle of the group scores 4.6 and a company needs 6.0 to reach its top quarter, which leaves People Inc. well below the median.
On profitability, People Inc. scores 1.2, a weak reading. Its peers have a median of 3.7 across 77 Communication Services companies, which places it well below them, at the 18th percentile. A low reading here is the first thing to explain: it is the pillar most closely tied to whether the business creates value at all.
On solvency, People Inc. scores 2.5, a weak reading. Its peers have a median of 4.8 across 62 Communication Services companies, which places it well below them, at the 21st percentile. Weak solvency means debt is heavy relative to earnings or cash flow, which makes the business more sensitive to interest rates and to any fall in profits.
On growth, People Inc. scores 2.6, a weak reading. Its peers have a median of 4.7 across 64 Communication Services companies, which places it well below them, at the 26th percentile. A low growth score is common for large, established companies and is not a verdict on quality on its own, but it limits how the business can compound.
Efficiency scores 4.5 out of 10, which reads as average. The median across 76 Communication Services companies is 6.1, so People Inc. is well below its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 26th percentile. An average efficiency reading suggests the business turns its assets and earnings into cash at roughly the rate its sector does.
Predictability scores 3.3 out of 10, which reads as weak. The median across 80 Communication Services companies is 4.5, so People Inc. is below its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 27th percentile. Weak predictability means revenue or earnings have swung widely from year to year, so any single year’s figures are a less reliable guide.
Efficiency at 4.5 is People Inc.’s best pillar and profitability at 1.2 its weakest. The 3.3 point gap between them is worth keeping in mind when reading the overall. Leading with efficiency points to disciplined use of capital, a strength that compounds quietly. Weak profitability can be cyclical, so it helps to know whether margins are at a low point or a long-run level.
Closing the gap on profitability would do the most for the overall. At the median of Communication Services companies, 3.7, People Inc. would score about 3.3 instead of 2.7. The weights add up to 100 points (profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20), and People Inc. has a reading on every pillar.
For a fair comparison, start with companies of a similar size: the Communication Services companies below are nearest to People Inc. by market value, each scored on the same pillars.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading People Inc. scores 2.7 out of 10, which reads as low quality. Its strongest pillar is efficiency, its weakest is profitability. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
People Inc. ranks at the 15th percentile of the 80 Communication Services companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 4.6 and the top quarter starts at 6.0, against People Inc.’s 2.7.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 19, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for IAC are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card