RUM Group Inc. Class A Common Stock (RUM) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 80 Communication Services companies.
RUM Group Inc. Class A Common Stock (RUM) scores 1.6 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as low quality. The reading rests on efficiency, and profitability is what holds it back.
2 pillars, solvency and growth, are unscored because the filings behind them carry too little to judge. Each is shown as a dash rather than a zero, and the overall score is the weighted average of what could be scored.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
We cannot judge RUM Group Inc. Class A Common Stock yet, because fewer than five years had both a return on capital and a cost of capital we could measure. This is not a “no”.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
RUM Group Inc. Class A Common Stock (RUM) has a Lemma Quality Score of 1.6 out of 10 as of October 19, 2026, which reads as low quality. A low reading means the reported numbers show weakness on several pillars at once, which is a reason to understand the business before anything else. Five pillars feed it, and every one of them is computed from what the company reported rather than from its share price.
Ranked with the 80 Communication Services companies Lemma publishes, the score sits at the 3rd percentile, among the weakest quarter of its peers. For reference, the middle of the group scores 4.6 and a company needs 6.0 to reach its top quarter, which leaves RUM Group Inc. Class A Common Stock well below the median.
On profitability, RUM Group Inc. Class A Common Stock scores 0.0, a weak reading. Its peers have a median of 3.7 across 77 Communication Services companies, which places it well below them, at the 2nd percentile. Weak profitability means the business converts less of its sales and capital into profit than its peers, which can come from thin pricing power, high costs or a temporary squeeze.
There is no solvency score for RUM Group Inc. Class A Common Stock: too little of the pillar could be measured from the filings to give an honest reading. The overall is therefore the weighted average of the other pillars. Across 62 Communication Services companies the median for this pillar is 4.8. Without it the overall says nothing about how comfortably the company carries its debt.
There is no growth score for RUM Group Inc. Class A Common Stock: too little of the pillar could be measured from the filings to give an honest reading. The overall is therefore the weighted average of the other pillars. Across 64 Communication Services companies the median for this pillar is 4.7. Growth needs at least three years of comparable annual statements, so a short or interrupted history leaves it blank.
RUM Group Inc. Class A Common Stock’s efficiency score is 5.5 out of 10 (average). Against a median of 6.1 among 76 Communication Services companies, that is below the group and the 36th percentile. An average efficiency reading suggests the business turns its assets and earnings into cash at roughly the rate its sector does.
Predictability scores 0.7 out of 10, which reads as weak. The median across 80 Communication Services companies is 4.5, so RUM Group Inc. Class A Common Stock is well below its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 1st percentile. When results are this uneven, the averages behind the other pillars hide a lot of movement, and a longer history tells more than the latest year.
This is a lopsided profile. Efficiency scores 5.5 but profitability only 0.0, a gap of 5.5 points, so the overall hides a business that is excellent in one respect and weak in another. An efficiency lead means the operation turns what it has into cash better than it does anything else. A profitability shortfall is the one most worth understanding, since it bears directly on whether the business creates value.
Of everything that could lift RUM Group Inc. Class A Common Stock’s score, profitability matters most. Bringing it up to the 3.7 median of Communication Services companies would take the overall from 1.6 to roughly 3.1. Only three of the five pillars could be scored. Together they carry 60 of the 100 weight points (the full set is profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20), and the overall is the weighted average of those alone.
These are the Communication Services companies closest to RUM Group Inc. Class A Common Stock in market value. Each has its own page scored on the same five pillars, so the comparison is like for like.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading RUM Group Inc. Class A Common Stock scores 1.6 out of 10, which reads as low quality. Its strongest pillar is efficiency, its weakest is profitability. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
RUM Group Inc. Class A Common Stock ranks at the 3rd percentile of the 80 Communication Services companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 4.6 and the top quarter starts at 6.0, against RUM Group Inc. Class A Common Stock’s 1.6.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 19, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for RUM are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card