Liberty Global Ltd. Class C Common Shares (LBTYK) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 80 Communication Services companies.
Liberty Global Ltd. Class C Common Shares (LBTYK) scores 1.9 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as low quality. The reading rests on predictability, and profitability is what holds it back.
One pillar, growth, is unscored because the filings behind it carry too little to judge. It is shown as a dash rather than a zero, and the overall score is the weighted average of what could be scored.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
Liberty Global Ltd. Class C Common Shares’s filings do not show enough of the signs a moat leaves: 1 of 5 indicators passed.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
On the filings behind it, Liberty Global Ltd. Class C Common Shares earns 1.9 out of 10 for business quality as of October 19, 2026. That is low quality on our scale. A low reading means the reported numbers show weakness on several pillars at once, which is a reason to understand the business before anything else. The figure is a weighted average of five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks from reported statements.
Ranked with the 80 Communication Services companies Lemma publishes, the score sits at the 8th percentile, near the foot of the group. For reference, the middle of the group scores 4.6 and a company needs 6.0 to reach its top quarter, which leaves Liberty Global Ltd. Class C Common Shares well below the median.
Liberty Global Ltd. Class C Common Shares’s profitability score is 0.6 out of 10 (weak). Against a median of 3.7 among 77 Communication Services companies, that is well below the group and the 7th percentile. Low margins and returns leave little cushion, so a downturn or a cost increase reaches the bottom line quickly.
Solvency scores 2.6 out of 10, which reads as weak. The median across 62 Communication Services companies is 4.8, so Liberty Global Ltd. Class C Common Shares is well below its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 25th percentile. Weak solvency means debt is heavy relative to earnings or cash flow, which makes the business more sensitive to interest rates and to any fall in profits.
There is no growth score for Liberty Global Ltd. Class C Common Shares: too little of the pillar could be measured from the filings to give an honest reading. The overall is therefore the weighted average of the other pillars. Across 64 Communication Services companies the median for this pillar is 4.7. Growth needs at least three years of comparable annual statements, so a short or interrupted history leaves it blank.
Liberty Global Ltd. Class C Common Shares’s efficiency score is 1.6 out of 10 (weak). Against a median of 6.1 among 76 Communication Services companies, that is well below the group and the 2nd percentile. Weak efficiency means more capital is tied up to produce each unit of output, or less of reported profit is arriving as cash.
On predictability, Liberty Global Ltd. Class C Common Shares scores 3.2, a weak reading. Its peers have a median of 4.5 across 80 Communication Services companies, which places it below them, at the 21st percentile. A low predictability score often belongs to cyclical businesses, where good and bad years alternate with the economy or with commodity prices.
The profile is uneven. Predictability leads at 3.2 while profitability trails at 0.6, a gap of 2.6 points, so the overall averages a clear strength against a clear soft spot. A predictability lead means consistency is the business’s strongest trait, which makes its other readings easier to trust. A profitability shortfall is the one most worth understanding, since it bears directly on whether the business creates value.
Closing the gap on profitability would do the most for the overall. At the median of Communication Services companies, 3.7, Liberty Global Ltd. Class C Common Shares would score about 2.9 instead of 1.9. Only four of the five pillars could be scored. Together they carry 80 of the 100 weight points (the full set is profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20), and the overall is the weighted average of those alone.
These are the Communication Services companies closest to Liberty Global Ltd. Class C Common Shares in market value. Each has its own page scored on the same five pillars, so the comparison is like for like.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading Liberty Global Ltd. Class C Common Shares scores 1.9 out of 10, which reads as low quality. Its strongest pillar is predictability, its weakest is profitability. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
Liberty Global Ltd. Class C Common Shares ranks at the 8th percentile of the 80 Communication Services companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 4.6 and the top quarter starts at 6.0, against Liberty Global Ltd. Class C Common Shares’s 1.9.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 19, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for LBTYK are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card