Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 261 Financials companies.
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) scores 6.5 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as solid quality. The reading rests on profitability, and growth is what holds it back.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.’s returns on capital beat their cost in most measured years: 3 of 4 indicators passed.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
As of October 16, 2026, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. scores 6.5 out of 10 on the Lemma Quality Score, a reading of solid quality. This band covers companies that do several things well but not everything, so the pillar detail below matters more than the headline. Nothing in it comes from the share price or from forecasts: it is Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.’s own reported numbers, scored pillar by pillar.
Ranked with the 261 Financials companies Lemma publishes, the score sits at the 69th percentile, in the better half of its peers. The median across the group is 5.9, and the top quarter begins at 6.8, so Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. is above the typical company here.
On profitability, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. scores 8.1, a strong reading. Its peers have a median of 6.8 across 255 Financials companies, which places it above them, at the 83rd percentile. A reading this strong says the business earns well on what it sells and on the capital it uses, the kind of margin profile competitors find hard to copy.
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.’s solvency score is 6.7 out of 10 (average). Against a median of 8.5 among 140 Financials companies, that is well below the group and the 26th percentile. An average solvency reading suggests debt is present but manageable, the normal state for a company that borrows to fund its operations.
Growth scores 4.5 out of 10, which reads as average. The median across 241 Financials companies is 4.6, so Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. is in line with its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 48th percentile. A middling growth reading is typical of a mature company whose next step depends on reinvestment rather than on its market growing for it.
On efficiency, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. scores 6.9, an average reading. Its peers have a median of 5.8 across 211 Financials companies, which places it above them, at the 65th percentile. Efficiency near the median says the operation is neither unusually lean nor unusually capital hungry.
On predictability, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. scores 6.2, an average reading. Its peers have a median of 4.9 across 256 Financials companies, which places it above them, at the 76th percentile. Consistency near the median is typical, and it is worth checking whether the swings came from the business itself or from one-off items.
The gap between Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.’s best and worst pillar is wide: profitability at 8.1 against growth at 4.5, 3.6 points apart. An average of two readings this different deserves a closer look than the headline number. A profitability lead usually reflects something durable in the business model rather than a good year. Slow growth limits how fast the business can compound, even when everything else is in order.
Of everything that could lift Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.’s score, solvency matters most. Bringing it up to the 8.5 median of Financials companies would take the overall from 6.5 to roughly 6.9. The weights add up to 100 points (profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20), and Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. has a reading on every pillar.
For a fair comparison, start with companies of a similar size: the Financials companies below are nearest to Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. by market value, each scored on the same pillars.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. scores 6.5 out of 10, which reads as solid quality. Its strongest pillar is profitability, its weakest is growth. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. ranks at the 69th percentile of the 261 Financials companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 5.9 and the top quarter starts at 6.8, against Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.’s 6.5.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 16, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for ICE are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card