Quality score · MMC · Financials

Is Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. a quality business?

Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 261 Financials companies.

7.6/ 10
High quality
as of October 16, 2026
Profitability
8.2 Strong
Solvency
7.1 Strong
Growth
7.2 Strong
Efficiency
9.1 Strong
Predictability
6.9 Average
Strongest pillar: Efficiency · Weakest: Predictability

Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC) scores 7.6 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as high quality. The reading rests on efficiency, and predictability is what holds it back.

Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.

Does Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. have an economic moat?

Wide moat

Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.’s returns on capital beat their cost in almost every measured year, by a clear margin: 4 of 4 indicators passed.

Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →

How Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. scores

As of October 16, 2026, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. scores 7.6 out of 10 on the Lemma Quality Score, a reading of high quality. Businesses in this band tend to combine good returns with a sound balance sheet, even if one pillar lags the others. Nothing in it comes from the share price or from forecasts: it is Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.’s own reported numbers, scored pillar by pillar.

Ranked with the 261 Financials companies Lemma publishes, the score sits at the 91st percentile, in the top tenth of its peers. A typical company in the group scores 5.9, and the best quarter starts from 6.8. Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. is well above that typical reading.

Pillar by pillar

Profitability

Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.’s profitability score is 8.2 out of 10 (strong). Against a median of 6.8 among 255 Financials companies, that is above the group and the 86th percentile. A reading this strong says the business earns well on what it sells and on the capital it uses, the kind of margin profile competitors find hard to copy.

Solvency

Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.’s solvency score is 7.1 out of 10 (strong). Against a median of 8.5 among 140 Financials companies, that is below the group and the 30th percentile. Middling solvency says the balance sheet is neither a strength nor a constraint today.

Growth

Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.’s growth score is 7.2 out of 10 (strong). Against a median of 4.6 among 241 Financials companies, that is well above the group and the 86th percentile. A high growth score rewards a business that is getting bigger in a way that reaches the bottom line, not just the top one.

Efficiency

On efficiency, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. scores 9.1, a strong reading. Its peers have a median of 5.8 across 211 Financials companies, which places it well above them, at the 82nd percentile. High efficiency means assets and earnings are being turned into cash and output better than at most peers, a sign of a well run operation.

Predictability

Predictability scores 6.9 out of 10, which reads as average. The median across 256 Financials companies is 4.9, so Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. is well above its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 86th percentile. Consistency near the median is typical, and it is worth checking whether the swings came from the business itself or from one-off items.

Strongest and weakest pillar

Efficiency at 9.1 is Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.’s best pillar and predictability at 6.9 its weakest. The 2.2 point gap between them is worth keeping in mind when reading the overall. Leading with efficiency points to disciplined use of capital, a strength that compounds quietly. Uneven results make any single year a weaker guide to the next one.

What would move the score

Closing the gap on solvency would do the most for the overall. At the median of Financials companies, 8.5, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. would score about 7.9 instead of 7.6. The weights add up to 100 points (profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20), and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. has a reading on every pillar.

Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. and similar companies

For a fair comparison, start with companies of a similar size: the Financials companies below are nearest to Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. by market value, each scored on the same pillars.

What each pillar measures

Profitability

8.2 / 10

How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.

Solvency

7.1 / 10

The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.

Growth

7.2 / 10

How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.

Efficiency

9.1 / 10

How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.

Predictability

6.9 / 10

How stable and consistent results have been over time.

How this score is calculated

Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.

Limitations

This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.

Educational only. Not investment advice.

FAQ

Is Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. a quality business?

On this reading Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. scores 7.6 out of 10, which reads as high quality. Its strongest pillar is efficiency, its weakest is predictability. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.

How does Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. compare with other Financials companies?

Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. ranks at the 91st percentile of the 261 Financials companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 5.9 and the top quarter starts at 6.8, against Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.’s 7.6.

What does the MMC quality score measure?

Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.

How current is this score?

This page last changed on October 16, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for MMC are in the app.

Does a high score mean the stock is cheap?

No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.

All quality scoresFinancials quality rankingFinancials screener

Score any company, not just these.

Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.

Free to start · No credit card