Quality score · IHS · Communication Services

Is IHS Holding Limited a quality business?

IHS Holding Limited (IHS) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 80 Communication Services companies.

6.5/ 10
Solid quality
as of October 19, 2026
Profitability
—
Solvency
—
Growth
5.6 Average
Efficiency
6.0 Average
Predictability
7.7 Strong
Strongest pillar: Predictability · Weakest: Growth

IHS Holding Limited (IHS) scores 6.5 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as solid quality. The reading rests on predictability, and growth is what holds it back.

2 pillars, profitability and solvency, are unscored because the filings behind them carry too little to judge. Each is shown as a dash rather than a zero, and the overall score is the weighted average of what could be scored.

Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.

Does IHS Holding Limited have an economic moat?

Not enough data

We cannot judge IHS Holding Limited yet, because fewer than five years had both a return on capital and a cost of capital we could measure. This is not a “no”.

Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →

How IHS Holding Limited scores

On the filings behind it, IHS Holding Limited earns 6.5 out of 10 for business quality as of October 19, 2026. That is solid quality on our scale. A solid reading is a respectable business with clear strengths and at least one area that falls short of the best in its field. The figure is a weighted average of five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks from reported statements.

Ranked with the 80 Communication Services companies Lemma publishes, the score sits at the 82nd percentile, inside the top quarter of the group. For reference, the middle of the group scores 4.6 and a company needs 6.0 to reach its top quarter, which leaves IHS Holding Limited well above the median.

Pillar by pillar

Profitability

Profitability has no score for IHS Holding Limited. Fewer than half of the pillar’s metric weight could be computed from the reported statements, so it is drawn as a dash and left out of the overall rather than counted as a zero. For context, the median profitability score across 77 Communication Services companies is 3.7. Without it the overall leans on balance sheet, growth and consistency, and says little about margins or returns on capital.

Solvency

There is no solvency score for IHS Holding Limited: too little of the pillar could be measured from the filings to give an honest reading. The overall is therefore the weighted average of the other pillars. Across 62 Communication Services companies the median for this pillar is 4.8. Without it the overall says nothing about how comfortably the company carries its debt.

Growth

IHS Holding Limited’s growth score is 5.6 out of 10 (average). Against a median of 4.7 among 64 Communication Services companies, that is above the group and the 56th percentile. Average growth reflects a business expanding at roughly the pace of its sector, without a clear acceleration or decline.

Efficiency

On efficiency, IHS Holding Limited scores 6.0, an average reading. Its peers have a median of 6.1 across 76 Communication Services companies, which places it in line with them, at the 48th percentile. Efficiency near the median says the operation is neither unusually lean nor unusually capital hungry.

Predictability

Predictability scores 7.7 out of 10, which reads as strong. The median across 80 Communication Services companies is 4.5, so IHS Holding Limited is well above its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 99th percentile. High predictability means the company’s results have moved steadily from year to year, which makes the other pillars more trustworthy as a guide.

Strongest and weakest pillar

The profile is uneven. Predictability leads at 7.7 while growth trails at 5.6, a gap of 2.1 points, so the overall averages a clear strength against a clear soft spot. A predictability lead means consistency is the business’s strongest trait, which makes its other readings easier to trust. A growth shortfall often comes with size or a maturing market, and is less of a concern if the other pillars are strong.

What would move the score

Every scored pillar is at or above the median of Communication Services companies, so there is no catch-up left to lift the overall. The risk runs the other way: a one point fall in growth, the heaviest of them, would take the score from 6.5 to about 6.1. Only three of the five pillars could be scored. Together they carry 55 of the 100 weight points (the full set is profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20), and the overall is the weighted average of those alone.

IHS Holding Limited and similar companies

These are the Communication Services companies closest to IHS Holding Limited in market value. Each has its own page scored on the same five pillars, so the comparison is like for like.

What each pillar measures

Profitability

—

How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.

Solvency

—

The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.

Growth

5.6 / 10

How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.

Efficiency

6.0 / 10

How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.

Predictability

7.7 / 10

How stable and consistent results have been over time.

How this score is calculated

Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.

Limitations

This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.

Educational only. Not investment advice.

FAQ

Is IHS Holding Limited a quality business?

On this reading IHS Holding Limited scores 6.5 out of 10, which reads as solid quality. Its strongest pillar is predictability, its weakest is growth. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.

How does IHS Holding Limited compare with other Communication Services companies?

IHS Holding Limited ranks at the 82nd percentile of the 80 Communication Services companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 4.6 and the top quarter starts at 6.0, against IHS Holding Limited’s 6.5.

What does the IHS quality score measure?

Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.

How current is this score?

This page last changed on October 19, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for IHS are in the app.

Does a high score mean the stock is cheap?

No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.

All quality scoresCommunication Services quality rankingCommunication Services screener

Score any company, not just these.

Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.

Free to start · No credit card