Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (WTW) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 261 Financials companies.
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (WTW) scores 6.8 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as solid quality. The reading rests on efficiency, and predictability is what holds it back.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company’s returns on capital beat their cost in most measured years: 2 of 4 indicators passed.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (WTW) has a Lemma Quality Score of 6.8 out of 10 as of October 18, 2026, which reads as solid quality. A solid reading is a respectable business with clear strengths and at least one area that falls short of the best in its field. Five pillars feed it, and every one of them is computed from what the company reported rather than from its share price.
Among the 261 Financials companies with a published score, that ranks at the 75th percentile, in the top quarter of its peers. The median across the group is 5.9, and the top quarter begins at 6.8, so Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company is above the typical company here.
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company’s profitability score is 7.7 out of 10 (strong). Against a median of 6.8 among 255 Financials companies, that is above the group and the 71st percentile. Returns and margins at this level leave room to reinvest, absorb a bad year or return cash to shareholders without straining the business.
Solvency scores 6.8 out of 10, which reads as average. The median across 140 Financials companies is 8.5, so Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company is well below its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 28th percentile. An average solvency reading suggests debt is present but manageable, the normal state for a company that borrows to fund its operations.
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company’s growth score is 6.0 out of 10 (average). Against a median of 4.6 among 241 Financials companies, that is above the group and the 70th percentile. Growth near the median is neither a reason to buy nor a concern, but it does mean the quality case rests more on the other pillars.
On efficiency, Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company scores 8.3, a strong reading. Its peers have a median of 5.8 across 211 Financials companies, which places it well above them, at the 73rd percentile. High efficiency means assets and earnings are being turned into cash and output better than at most peers, a sign of a well run operation.
Predictability scores 5.2 out of 10, which reads as average. The median across 256 Financials companies is 4.9, so Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company is in line with its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 54th percentile. An average predictability reading means results have wobbled about as much as is normal for the sector.
The profile is uneven. Efficiency leads at 8.3 while predictability trails at 5.2, a gap of 3.1 points, so the overall averages a clear strength against a clear soft spot. An efficiency lead means the operation turns what it has into cash better than it does anything else. A predictability shortfall means the record is volatile, so the averages behind the other pillars move more than they appear to.
Of everything that could lift Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company’s score, solvency matters most. Bringing it up to the 8.5 median of Financials companies would take the overall from 6.8 to roughly 7.1. All five pillars could be scored, so the overall uses the full set of weights out of 100: profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20.
These are the Financials companies closest to Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company in market value. Each has its own page scored on the same five pillars, so the comparison is like for like.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company scores 6.8 out of 10, which reads as solid quality. Its strongest pillar is efficiency, its weakest is predictability. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company ranks at the 75th percentile of the 261 Financials companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 5.9 and the top quarter starts at 6.8, against Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company’s 6.8.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 18, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for WTW are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card