Forestar Group Inc. Common Stock (FOR) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 84 Real Estate companies.
Forestar Group Inc. Common Stock (FOR) scores 4.6 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as mixed quality. The reading rests on growth, and predictability is what holds it back.
One pillar, solvency, is unscored because the filings behind it carry too little to judge. It is shown as a dash rather than a zero, and the overall score is the weighted average of what could be scored.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
We cannot judge Forestar Group Inc. Common Stock yet, because fewer than five years had both a return on capital and a cost of capital we could measure. This is not a “no”.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
As of October 19, 2026, Forestar Group Inc. Common Stock scores 4.6 out of 10 on the Lemma Quality Score, a reading of mixed quality. In this band one or two pillars are usually holding the score up while others drag it down, which the breakdown below makes visible. Nothing in it comes from the share price or from forecasts: it is Forestar Group Inc. Common Stock’s own reported numbers, scored pillar by pillar.
Set against 84 Real Estate companies, Forestar Group Inc. Common Stock lands at the 36th percentile, in the weaker half of its peers. A typical company in the group scores 5.2, and the best quarter starts from 5.9. Forestar Group Inc. Common Stock is below that typical reading.
Forestar Group Inc. Common Stock’s profitability score is 4.7 out of 10 (average). Against a median of 4.8 among 80 Real Estate companies, that is in line with the group and the 47th percentile. An average profitability reading usually means the company earns a fair return without obvious pricing power, so the other pillars decide more of the story.
Solvency has no score for Forestar Group Inc. Common Stock. Fewer than half of the pillar’s metric weight could be computed from the reported statements, so it is drawn as a dash and left out of the overall rather than counted as a zero. For context, the median solvency score across 34 Real Estate companies is 3.7. Without it the overall says nothing about how comfortably the company carries its debt.
Forestar Group Inc. Common Stock’s growth score is 5.5 out of 10 (average). Against a median of 5.2 among 74 Real Estate companies, that is in line with the group and the 53rd percentile. Average growth reflects a business expanding at roughly the pace of its sector, without a clear acceleration or decline.
Efficiency scores 4.8 out of 10, which reads as average. The median across 80 Real Estate companies is 6.4, so Forestar Group Inc. Common Stock is well below its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 24th percentile. Middling efficiency is unremarkable on its own, though improvements here tend to show up in free cash flow first.
On predictability, Forestar Group Inc. Common Stock scores 3.5, a weak reading. Its peers have a median of 4.9 across 83 Real Estate companies, which places it below them, at the 28th percentile. When results are this uneven, the averages behind the other pillars hide a lot of movement, and a longer history tells more than the latest year.
Growth at 5.5 is Forestar Group Inc. Common Stock’s best pillar and predictability at 3.5 its weakest. The 2.0 point gap between them is worth keeping in mind when reading the overall. Leading with growth is attractive as long as the expansion is earning a decent return. Uneven results make any single year a weaker guide to the next one.
The pillar with the most room to move the score is predictability. If it rose to the median of Real Estate companies, 4.9, Forestar Group Inc. Common Stock’s overall score would go from 4.6 to about 4.9. With one pillar unscored, the overall rests on 80 of the 100 weight points, spread across the four pillars that could be measured (the full set is profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20).
For a fair comparison, start with companies of a similar size: the Real Estate companies below are nearest to Forestar Group Inc. Common Stock by market value, each scored on the same pillars.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading Forestar Group Inc. Common Stock scores 4.6 out of 10, which reads as mixed quality. Its strongest pillar is growth, its weakest is predictability. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
Forestar Group Inc. Common Stock ranks at the 36th percentile of the 84 Real Estate companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 5.2 and the top quarter starts at 5.9, against Forestar Group Inc. Common Stock’s 4.6.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 19, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for FOR are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card