Marcus & Millichap, Inc. (MMI) scored on five pillars from its reported financial statements, and ranked against 84 Real Estate companies.
Marcus & Millichap, Inc. (MMI) scores 2.8 out of 10 as of , computed from its reported financial statements. That reads as low quality. The reading rests on efficiency, and growth is what holds it back.
One pillar, solvency, is unscored because the filings behind it carry too little to judge. It is shown as a dash rather than a zero, and the overall score is the weighted average of what could be scored.
Data provided by Twelve Data. Scores are computed by Lemma Analysis from reported financials.
We cannot judge Marcus & Millichap, Inc. yet, because fewer than five years had both a return on capital and a cost of capital we could measure. This is not a “no”.
Quantitative signs of a moat, read from the filed statements. This is not a judgement of where it comes from (brand, network effects, switching costs). How Lemma measures a moat →
The Quality Score for MMI stands at 2.8 out of 10 as of October 19, 2026, which puts Marcus & Millichap, Inc. in the low quality band. Scores this low usually reflect thin margins, a stretched balance sheet or an erratic record, and the pillars below show which. It rolls Marcus & Millichap, Inc.’s profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability into one number, each judged against the norms of its sector.
Among the 84 Real Estate companies with a published score, that ranks at the 12th percentile, in the bottom quarter of the group. For reference, the middle of the group scores 5.2 and a company needs 5.9 to reach its top quarter, which leaves Marcus & Millichap, Inc. well below the median.
Marcus & Millichap, Inc.’s profitability score is 2.5 out of 10 (weak). Against a median of 4.8 among 80 Real Estate companies, that is well below the group and the 25th percentile. Weak profitability means the business converts less of its sales and capital into profit than its peers, which can come from thin pricing power, high costs or a temporary squeeze.
Solvency has no score for Marcus & Millichap, Inc. Fewer than half of the pillar’s metric weight could be computed from the reported statements, so it is drawn as a dash and left out of the overall rather than counted as a zero. For context, the median solvency score across 34 Real Estate companies is 3.7. Without it the overall says nothing about how comfortably the company carries its debt.
Growth scores 0.0 out of 10, which reads as weak. Every other company in the group scores higher here, against a median of 5.2 across 74 Real Estate companies. When growth is this low the question is whether it is a pause or a trend, and the history behind the filings is the place to look.
Efficiency scores 6.7 out of 10, which reads as average. The median across 80 Real Estate companies is 6.4, so Marcus & Millichap, Inc. is in line with its peers on this pillar and ranks at the 56th percentile. An average efficiency reading suggests the business turns its assets and earnings into cash at roughly the rate its sector does.
On predictability, Marcus & Millichap, Inc. scores 2.9, a weak reading. Its peers have a median of 4.9 across 83 Real Estate companies, which places it well below them, at the 17th percentile. When results are this uneven, the averages behind the other pillars hide a lot of movement, and a longer history tells more than the latest year.
The gap between Marcus & Millichap, Inc.’s best and worst pillar is wide: efficiency at 6.7 against growth at 0.0, 6.7 points apart. An average of two readings this different deserves a closer look than the headline number. Leading with efficiency points to disciplined use of capital, a strength that compounds quietly. Slow growth limits how fast the business can compound, even when everything else is in order.
The pillar with the most room to move the score is growth. If it rose to the median of Real Estate companies, 5.2, Marcus & Millichap, Inc.’s overall score would go from 2.8 to about 4.1. With one pillar unscored, the overall rests on 80 of the 100 weight points, spread across the four pillars that could be measured (the full set is profitability 25, solvency 20, growth 20, efficiency 15, predictability 20).
For a fair comparison, start with companies of a similar size: the Real Estate companies below are nearest to Marcus & Millichap, Inc. by market value, each scored on the same pillars.
How much profit the company generates from its capital and sales.
The company’s ability to service debt and meet its obligations.
How fast revenue, earnings and cash flow are compounding.
How well assets and earnings convert into cash and output.
How stable and consistent results have been over time.
Each metric is scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks, where higher is better. Metrics roll up into five pillars, and the pillars combine into the overall score using the weights shown. Sector-sensitive metrics are judged relative to peers in the same sector.
This score is a systematic, backward-looking read of reported fundamentals. It does not judge valuation, management quality, competitive moat, or future prospects, and can be distorted by one-off items or unusual accounting. Treat it as a starting point, not a recommendation.
Educational only. Not investment advice.
On this reading Marcus & Millichap, Inc. scores 2.8 out of 10, which reads as low quality. Its strongest pillar is efficiency, its weakest is growth. Quality is not the same as a good investment: the score says nothing about the price you would pay.
Marcus & Millichap, Inc. ranks at the 12th percentile of the 84 Real Estate companies Lemma publishes a score for. The median there is 5.2 and the top quarter starts at 5.9, against Marcus & Millichap, Inc.’s 2.8.
Five pillars, each scored from 0 to 10 against sector-aware benchmarks and then weighted into one overall reading: profitability, solvency, growth, efficiency and predictability. Everything comes from reported financials, and nothing comes from price, sentiment or forecasts.
This page last changed on October 19, 2026. The score moves with the financial statements, so the page changes when a new filing moves the reading rather than on a schedule. Live figures for MMI are in the app.
No. Quality and valuation are separate questions, and a good business at the wrong price is still a bad purchase. Score the business here, then price it with a DCF you control.
Inside Lemma Analysis the same five pillars run on every company we cover, with the metrics behind each one, current fundamentals, a DCF you control and a watchlist that tells you when the price catches up.
Free to start · No credit card